期刊文献+

奔走在迷津中的课程改革 被引量:56

The Curriculum Reform Running in Mazes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文首先从历史视角分析了1949年以来中国八次课程改革的主要内容,以及这种始终自上而下行政推进的精英决策模式的特点;其次针对第8次课改,提出关于时代挑战、教育目标刻画、人的学习机制分析和知识价值的思考乃是构成一项课程改革的理性基础和出发点,而新课程并没有给出这样的坚实思考;第三,从国际视野分析了新课程方案在核心理念及课程目标解释等方面的框架性缺失;第四,针对新课程标志性的四项改革举措,分别论证其实践基础的脆弱和不同理论前提的内在冲突,认为看似宏大的新课程计划其实建立在一片流沙之上;最后,本文主张重新审视课程改革的必要性,强调转向学生的深度学习和建立教育改革的问责制,并进一步提出改革的伦理取向在于从"信念伦理"走向"责任伦理"。 This paper first analyzes historically the main contents of seven rounds of curriculum reforms in China since 1949,and indicates that those reforms follow an elite decision-making mode,which are top-down and implemented administratively.Second,the paper points out that the eighth curriculum reform should have started but it did not start from responding to challenges of times,characterizing education goals,analyzing human learning mechanisms,and thinking of values of knowledge,all of which constitute the foundation of a curriculum reform.Third,this paper analyzes the new curriculum plan from an international perspective,and points out that this plan missed several key components such as its core ideas and the interpretation of the curriculum goals.Fourth,focusing on four featured measures of the new curriculum reform,this paper demonstrates that their practical basis is weak and there exist internal conflicts among their theoretical bases.In this sense,this paper argues that this seemingly ambitious new curriculum plan is actually built on quicksand.Finally,this paper advocates that it is necessary to rethink the curriculum reform,emphasizes that the reform should shift its focus to studeats' deep learning and the establishment of its accountability system,and further puts forward the idea that the ethical orientation of the reform should be from the ' conviction ethics' to ' responsibility ethics'.
作者 吴刚
出处 《北京大学教育评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期20-50,185-186,共31页 Peking University Education Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献57

  • 1[德]卡尔·马克思.路易·波拿巴的雾月十八日[A].马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1976:603,17.
  • 2马克思.《黑格尔法哲学批判》导言[A].马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1976:9.
  • 3唐骏.教科书30年变脸记[N].解放日报,2009.10.06(08).
  • 4郑东辉.新中国课程改革的历史回顾[J].教育与职业,2005(13):49-51. 被引量:18
  • 5[英]K.科尔巴奇.政策[M].张毅,韩志明译.长春:吉林人民出版社,2005:51.
  • 6林水波 张世贤.公共政策[M].台北:五南图书出版公司,1982..
  • 7[美]托马斯·戴伊.公共政策新论[M].台北:韦伯文化事业出版社,1999.
  • 8[美]戴克·F.沃克,乔纳森·F.索尔蒂斯.课程与目标[M].王纾译.北京:教育科学出版社,2009:94.
  • 9Gilbert, R. (2010). Curriculum reform. P. peterson, E. Baker, B. Megaw(ed. ). International encyclopedia of education. Elsevier Ltd. Vol. 1. 510.
  • 10OECD. PISA Pathways to success: How knowledge and skills at age 15 shape future lives in Canada. (2010). OECD Publishing, 24.

二级参考文献87

共引文献659

同被引文献704

引证文献56

二级引证文献279

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部