制度、法官与难办案件——从唐慧上访案等切入

System,Judge and Tough Cases——In the aspect of Tang suit case

在当下中国司法语境中,司法信任危机越来越凸显。从宏观上来看,是因为改革开放的深入,外来权利观念的冲击,同时社会结构变革加速,社会同质性降低。但是在这样一个社会中,我国的一些诉求机制却存在不尽合理的地方,这主要表现在司法诉求机制与行政诉求机制并存,使得机构设置冗杂、行政权司法化,使得本该由司法机构来定纷止争的难办案件,更多的却由行政机关来审判或者干涉。这不仅导致了审判效率的低下和权力与其行使主体的不对称,而且促使行政权在逐渐侵蚀司法权。这固然是制度本身的结果,但是最为重要的是法官在审判难办案件时处理不当的结果。以实用主义的审判思维为导向,重塑司法权威,进而促使行政诉求机制慢慢走向消亡。

In the present context of China＇ s justice, the crisis of judicial credibility is more and more highlighted. In a macro point of view, it is related with the deepening of the reform and opening up, impacting by the concept of foreign rights and the change of social structure, while the social homogeneity gets low. In our country , some parts of the appeal mechanism are not reasonable, for exampel, the judicial appeal mechanism and administrative appeal mechanism exist together, which makes many judicial enforcement agencies have rights to deliver the same case simultaneously, and some tough cases usually are judged by administrate organ instead of law courts, which not only leads to the low judicial efficiency and the asymmetry of power and its subject, but also makes the executive power gradually replace judicial power. This is the result of the system itself, but it is the main reason that difficult cases are improperly handled by the judge in the trial. Taking pragmatic trials to thinking for guidance in the trial, the judicial authority will be reshaped to prompt the administrative appeal mechanism vanishing.