期刊文献+

基于2-可加模糊测度的NPD项目复杂性评价 被引量:7

NPD Project Complexity Evaluation Based on 2-order Additive Fuzzy Measures Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对NPD项目复杂性各因素间具有的关联性以及传统评价方法的局限性,提出一种基于关联多属性的2-可加模糊测度方法来对NPD项目复杂性进行评价。在界定项目复杂性内涵的基础上,从产品复杂性、环境复杂性、组织复杂性和技术复杂性四个方面构建了NPD项目复杂性评价指标体系。从模糊测度、默比乌斯变换和交互作用系数间的转化关系出发,基于最大Marichal熵原则,提出了一种确定2-可加模糊测度值的新方法。利用Choquet积分作为集结算子,自下而上计算各候选方案的综合评价值。最后,通过具体算例说明了该方法的可行性和有效性。 With respect to the interaction among some complexity indexes of NPD project and the limitation of traditional evaluation methods, the 2-order additive fuzzy measures method based on multi-attribute with interaction is proposed to evaluate the complexity level of NPD project. After defining the concept of project complexity based on the two main viewpoints of ontology and epistemology, the paper establishes the complexity evaluation index system of NPD project, which is composed of product complexity, environment complexity, organization complexity and technology complexity. By introducing the transformation relationships among the fuzzy measures, mobius representation and interaction index, a new method for identifying the 2-order additive fuzzy measures is proposed on the principle of maximum Mariehal entropy. Then the paper presents the Choquet integral as an aggregation operator to calculate the synthetical values of the alternatives from bottom to top. Finally, an example is given to demonstrate the feasibility and validity of the proposed method, which will reduce the diffieuhy in mak- ing decision for experts to some extent and have a relatively strong practicability.
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期196-202,共7页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70972126) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20106102110042)
关键词 复杂性评价 关联多属性 2-可加模糊测度 CHOQUET积分 NPD项目 complexity evaluation multiple attributes with interaction 2-order additive fuzzy measures Choquet integral NPD project
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1方炜,孙树栋.新产品研发项目关键成功因素实证研究——基于不同的企业创新战略[J].科研管理,2007,28(5):102-109. 被引量:11
  • 2Kim 3, Wilemon D. Sources and assessment of complexity in NPD pjeets [ J]. R&D Management, 2003, 33( 1 ) : 15-30.
  • 3陈劲,景劲松.驭险创新--企业复杂产品系统仓愉项目风险管趣iM].北京:知识产权出版社,2005.
  • 4Schlick C M, Beutner E, Duckwitz Set al. A complexity measure for new product development projects [ J]. Aachen i Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Engineering Management, 2007. 143-150.
  • 5Novak $, Eppinger S D. Sourcing by design: product complexity and the supply chain[J]. Management Science, 2001, 47( 1 ): 189-204.
  • 6Tatikonda M V, Rosenthal S R. Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: a deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation[ J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2000, 47 (1) : 74- 87.
  • 7Vidal L A, Marle F, Bocquet J C. Measuring project complexity using the analytic hierarchy process[ J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2011, 29(6) : 718-727.
  • 8Muller R, Geraldi J G, Turner J R. Linking complexity and leadership competences of project managers [ C ]. Brighton : Proceedings of IRNOP VIII Conference on International Research Network for Organizing by Projects, 2007.
  • 9Xia W, Lee G. Grasping the complexity of IS development projects[ J]. Communications of the ACM, 2004, 47 (5) : 69-74.
  • 10Grabiseh M. Fuzzy integral in multi-criteria decision making[J]. -Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1995, 69(3): 279-298.

二级参考文献51

  • 1方炜,孙树栋,郭云涛.企业新产品研发项目成功标准的系统界定[J].中国软科学,2005(11):117-123. 被引量:10
  • 2Sugeno M.Theory of fuzzy integrals and its application[D].Tokyo:Tokyo Institute of Technology,1974.
  • 3Grabisch M.A new algorithm for identifying fuzzy measures and its application to pattern recognition[C] //International Joint Conference of 4th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and the 2nd International Fuzzy Engineering Symposium,Yokohama,Japan,1995:145-150.
  • 4Kojadinovic I.Minimum variance capacity identification[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2007,177(1):498-514.
  • 5Combarro E F,Miranda P.Identification of fuzzy measures from sample data with genetic algorithms[J].Com-puters & Operations Research,2006,33:3046-3066.
  • 6Chen Y W.Implementing an analytical hierarchy process by fuzzy integral[J].International Journal of Fuzzy Systems,2001,3(3):493-502.
  • 7Takahagi E.On Identification methods of λ-fuzzy measures using weights and λ[J].Japanese Journal of Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2000,12(5):665-676.
  • 8Marichal J L,Roubens M.Dependence between criteria and multiple criteria decision aid[C] //2nd International Workshop on Preferences and Decisions,Trento,Italy,1998:69-75.
  • 9Yoneda M,Fukami S,Grabisch M.Interactive determination of a utility function represented by a fuzzy inte-gral[J].Information Sciences,1993,(71):43-64.
  • 10Zhang C,Ma C B,Xu J D.A New Fuzzy MCDM Method Based on Trapezoidal Fuzzy AHP and Hierarchical Fuzzy Integral[M].FSKD,2005.

共引文献48

同被引文献130

引证文献7

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部