期刊文献+

多叶准直器角度因素对调强放疗计划实施效率的影响 被引量:10

The influence of multileaf collimator angle on delivery efficiency for IMRT treatment
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨调强放疗计划优化时多叶准直器(MLC)角度因素对优化结果中子野数(滑窗模式下为控制点数)和机器跳数影响,以及由此对调强放疗实施效率的影响.方法 选择10例拟行调强放疗的靶区形状为长条状的患者CT图像,在MLC运行方向与靶区长轴垂直(横向)和平行(纵向)方向分别以静态子野调强方式和滑窗调强方式设计计划并进行优化,在保证靶区和危及器官受量相同情况下,分别比较静态子野调强模式和滑窗调强模式下两种准直器角度时计划子野数或控制点数和机器跳数差别.结果 MLC纵向方式较横向方式静态子野数平均增加52.8%,滑窗调强控制点数增加58.2%,机器跳数平均增加幅度分别为49.6%和61.9%,子野数或控制点数和机器跳数均不同(P =0.000).结论 在MLC调强放疗计划优化中选择MLC运行方向垂直于靶区长轴,在不影响靶区和危及器官受量情况下,可明显减少子野数或控制点数和机器跳数、缩短治疗时间、提高治疗效率,具有一定的临床实用价值. Abstract: Objective To study the influence of the angle of multileaf collimator leaves on segments (control point for sliding windows) number and monitor units in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan optimization.Methods 10 cases undergone IMRT with rectangle target volume were choosed,2 plan were designed with step and shot technique and sliding windows technique for running direction of collimator with target long axis vertical and parallel respectively,compared the plans with similar optimization parameters for different angle of the collimator.Results The number of segments and monitor units increased by 52.8% and 49.6% more than longitudinal direction of leaf collimator with static IMRT respectively,there appeared significant difference (P =0.000) ; and the number of segments and monitor units increased by 58.2% and 61.9% more than longitudinal direction of leaf collimator with dynamic IMRT respectively,there appeared significant difference (P =0.000).Conclusions For the optimization of IMRT based on multileaf collimator,the direction of collimator perpendicular to the target long axis,there could be obviously decrease the number of monitor units,shorten the treatment time,improve the treatment efficiency with similar dose distribution.
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期482-484,共3页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
关键词 多叶准直器 静态子野 滑窗 计划优化 Keywords:Multileaf collimator Static segment Sliding windows Plan optimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Samuelsson A,Kad-Axel J.Intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning for dynamic multileaf collimator delivery:influence of different parameters on dose distributions.Radiother Oncol,2003,66:19-28.
  • 2戴建荣,胡逸民.调强放疗的计划设计[J].中国医疗器械信息,2005,11(2):9-12. 被引量:27
  • 3Kamath S,Sahni S,Li J,et al.Leaf sequencing algorithms for segmented multileaf collimation.Phys Med Biol,2003,48:307-324.
  • 4Kamath S,Sahni S,Palta J,et al.Algorithms for optimal sequencing of dynamic multileaf collimator.Phys Med Biol,2004,49:33-54.
  • 5Chui CS,Chan MF,Yorke E,et al.Delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy with a conventional multileaf collimator:comparison of dynamic and segmental.Med Phys,2001,12:2441-2449.
  • 6杨瑞杰,戴建荣,胡逸民.调强放射治疗的计划优化[J].中国医疗器械信息,2005,11(2):13-16. 被引量:18
  • 7王闯,戴建荣,胡逸民.射野方向优化方法[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2004,13(2):104-106. 被引量:6
  • 8Wang C,Dai J,Hu Y.Optimization of beam orientations and beam weights for conformal radiotherapy using mixed integer programming.Phys Med Biol,2003,48:4065-4076.
  • 9Yang R J,Dai JR,Yang Y,et al.Beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using mixed integer programming.Phys Med Biol,2006,51:3653-3666.
  • 10Stein J,Mohan R.Number and orientation of beams in intensity modulated radiation therapy.Med Phys,1997,24:149-160.

二级参考文献55

  • 1于金明,李宝生.调强放射治疗的临床应用现状与存在的问题[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(3):188-190. 被引量:43
  • 2李龙根,徐志勇,胡伟刚.直接机器参数优化技术在鼻咽癌调强放疗的应用[J].中国癌症杂志,2006,16(12):1038-1042. 被引量:11
  • 3Chauvet L,Petitfils A,Lehobey C,et al.The sliding slit test for dynamic IMBT:useful tool for adjnstment of MLC related parameters.Phys Med Biol,2005,50:563-580.
  • 4Jin JY,Yin FF,Ryn S,et al.Dosimetric study using different leafwidth MLCs for treatment planning of dynamic conformal arcs and intensity-modulated radiosurgery.Med Phys,2005,32:405-411.
  • 5Samuelsson A,Johansson KA.Intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning for dynamic muitileaf collimator delivery:influence of different parameters on dose distributions.Radiother Oncol,2003,66:19-28.
  • 6Lo Sasso T,Chui CS,Katcher GJ,et al.The use of multi -leaf collimators for conformal radiotherapy of carcinomas of prostate and nasophrynx[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1993;25 (2):161.
  • 7Brahme A.Optimal setting of multi-leaf collimators in stationary beam radiation therapy[J].Strahlenther.Onkol,1988;164(6):343.
  • 8Yu CX,Yan D,Du MN,et al.Optimization of leaf position when shaping a radiation field with a multi-leaf collimator[J].Phys Med Biol,1995;40 (2):305.
  • 9ICRU.Prescribing,Recording and Reporting Photom Beam Therapy (Supplement to ICRU Report 50)[S].ICRU Report No.62,1999:12.
  • 10Julie Chapek,Matt Tobler,Beau J.Toy,et al.Optimization of Collimator Parameters to Reduce Rectal Dose in Intensity-Modulated Prostate Treatment Planning[J].Medical Dosimetry,2005;30(4):205-212.

共引文献71

同被引文献75

  • 1伍建华,卢泰祥,张华满,林承光.鼻咽癌的模拟定位技术操作程序[J].中国肿瘤,2004,13(9):553-555. 被引量:2
  • 2赵充,卢泰祥,韩非,卢丽霞,黄劭敏,邓小武,林承光,崔念基.139例鼻咽癌调强放疗的临床研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(1):1-6. 被引量:154
  • 3Bedford JL, Warrington AP. Commissioning of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2009, 73(2): 537-545.
  • 4Bedford JL. Treatment planning for volumetric modulated arc therapy[J]. Med Phys, 2009, 36(11): 5128-5138.
  • 5Otto K. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc[J]. Med Phys, 2008, 35(1): 310-317.
  • 6Treutwein M, Hipp M, Koelbl O, et al. Searching standard parameters for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of prostate cancer[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2012, 7: 108.
  • 7Kuijper IT, Dahele M, Senan S, et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy for stereotactic spine radiotherapy: a planning study and early clinical data[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2010, 94(2): 224-228.
  • 8ICRU. Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)[J]. J ICRU, 2010, 10(1): 34-36.
  • 9Feuvret L, No?l G, Mazeron JJ, et al. Conformity index: a review[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006, 64(2): 333-342.
  • 10Lee TF, Chao PJ, Ting HM, et al. Comparative analysis of SmartArc-based dual arc volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2011, 12(4): 3587.

引证文献10

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部