期刊文献+

循环胸腔热灌注化疗治疗恶性胸腔积液的临床研究 被引量:5

The Clinical Study of Continuous Intrapleural Hyperthermochemotherapy Perfusion in the Treatment of Malignant Pleural Effusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨循环胸腔热灌注化疗治疗恶性胸腔积液的临床疗效。方法选取我院收治确诊的恶性胸腔积液患者60例,并随机分为观察组和对照组。观察组30例,给予灭菌蒸馏水2 000 ml+顺铂(cis-diaminodichloroplatinum,CDDP)200 mg/m2胸内热疗60 min;对照组30例,则单纯胸内注入无菌滑石粉浆5 g。结果临床疗效观察显示,观察组有效率为83.3%(25/30);对照组有效率为43.3%(13/30);两组间临床疗效的差异有统计学意义(χ2=10.335,P=0.001)。Karnofsky生活质量评分显示,观察组总提高率为73.3%(22/30),对照组总提高率为46.7%(14/30),两组间总提高率差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.444,P=0.035)。两组患者围手术期均未出现严重并发症,观察组术后出现不良反应8例(26.7%),其中胸痛1例,低热5例,恶心呕吐2例;对照组术后出现不良反应12例(40%),其中灌注后胸痛5例,发热4例,恶心呕吐3例。两组不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。所有患者出现不良反应后予对症治疗后症状均缓解。结论应用循环胸腔热灌注化疗治疗恶性胸腔积液安全有效,值得临床推广。 Objective To investigate the effects of continuous intrapleural hyperthermochemotherapy perfusion in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Methods A total of 60 patients suffering MPE have been diagnosed, and randomly separated into 2 groups : the observation group was treated with hyper- thermia combined with distilled water 2 00Oral plus eisplatin 200mg/m2 and sustained 60 minutes, and the con- trol group received sterile talcum 5g intrapleural injection. After treatment, the response rates and KPS scores were observed. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 83.3% (25/30), the KPS score improved rate of 73.3% (22/30) ; The total effective rate of the control group was 43.3% (13/30) ,the KPS increasing rate was 46.7% (14/30). The total effective rate and the KPS score increasing rate of the observa- tion group were significantly better than that of the control group with P = 0. 001 and P = 0.035 respectively. Conclusion Continuous intrapleural hyperthermochemotherapy perfusion is a safe and effective treatment for malignant pleural effusion patients.
出处 《中国现代手术学杂志》 2013年第5期325-329,共5页 Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery
关键词 胸腔积液 恶性 胸膜固定术 高温 诱发 化学疗法 肿瘤 局部灌注 pleural effusion, malignant pleurodesis hyperthermia,induced chemotherapy,cancer, regional perfusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Heffner JE. Diagnosis and management of malignant pleural effu- sions [ J ]. Respirology, 2008,13 ( 1 ) :5-20.
  • 2Heffner JE, Nietert PJ, Barbieri C. Pleural fluid pH as a predictor of survival for patients with malignant pleural effusions[J]. Chest, 2000,117 ( 1 ) :79-86.
  • 3Davies HE, Mishra EK, Kahan BC, et al. Effect of indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion the TIME2 ran- domized controlled trial[ J]. Jama,2012,307 (22) :2383-2389.
  • 4Maceachern P, Tremblay A. Pleural controversy:pleurodesis ver- sus indwelling pleural catheters for malignant effusions[ J]. CancerInvest,2011,16 ( 5 ) : 747 -754.
  • 5Musani A1. Treatment option for malignant pleural effusion [J]. Curt Opin Pulm Med, 2009,15(4) :380-387.
  • 6Speetor M, Pollak JS. Management of malignant pleural effu- sions [J]. Semin Respir Crit Care,2008,29(4) :405-413.
  • 7Comert SS, Caglayan B, Parmaksiz ET, et al. Chemical pleurode- sis:from the point of view of pulmonary physicians and thoracic surgeons[J]. Turk Gogns Kalp Dama,2013,21 (2) :408-415.
  • 8Uzbeek MH, Almeida FA, Sarkiss MG, et al. Management of ma- lignant pleural effusions[J]. Adv Ther,2010,27(6) :334-347.
  • 9Dresler CM, Olak J, Herndon JE 2nd, et al. Phase III intergroup study of talc poudrage vs talc slurry sclerosis for malignant pleural effusion effusion[ J]. Chest,2005,127:909-915.
  • 10Davies HE, Lee YC Gary. Management of malignant pleural effu- sions: questions that need answem[J]. Curr Opin Pulm Med, 2013,19(4) :374-379.

同被引文献41

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部