摘要
熊克《中兴小历》是《建炎以来系年要录》编撰的重要参考史料之一,今存《要录》中称引者近五百处,考察其所引《小历》性质,不仅有利于了解《要录》自注引书情况,史料选择、编撰过程,也有助于对《要录》注文乃至《要录》本身的校勘。通过考察今存《皇朝中兴纪事本末》与《中兴小历》的关系,比勘两书与《要录》的文字异同,以及检核南宋史料对《中兴小历》的征引情况,可以大致认为,李心传《建炎以来系年要录》所引"熊克《小历》",应当是今存《皇朝中兴纪事本末》而非今本《中兴小历》。
The Synoptical Annals ofXiong Ke, which has been quoted about 500 times in the Jianyan Yilai Xinian Yaolu, is one of the important references during the compilation. The discussion on the nature of the Annals is significant not only for comprehension of the notes in Yaolu, selection of the material, and compilation of it, but also for collation of the notes in it and even the Jianyan Yilai Xinian Yaolu itself. The conclusion that the Annals of Xiong Ke quoted in the Jianyan Yilai Xinian Yaolu is just the Huangchao ZhongxingJishi Benmo of Song Dynasty but not the Synoptical Annals which has only 40 volumes today can be made by the textual comparison of the Huangchao ZhongxingJishi Benmo of Song Dynasty and the Synoptical Annals and by the Annals quoted in the historical material of Southern Song Dynasty.
出处
《湖南第一师范学院学报》
2013年第5期87-90,共4页
Journal of Hunan First Normal University
基金
国家社科基金青年项目"南宋考据学研究"(13CZW037)