期刊文献+

嗅觉实验配气方法的改进及影响因素研究

Improvement on gas sample preparation of odor test and study on influencing factors
原文传递
导出
摘要 配制气体样品是异味测试及相关研究的基础工作,配气稳定性直接影响测试结果准确度。三点比较式臭袋法使用微量进样针量取并转移液体标准物质到3 L无臭气袋的传统配气方法。对于异味阈值较小物质或样品浓度处于较低范围时,为了降低取样体积波动对配气精度和稳定性的影响。提出先将标准注入100 mL玻璃注射器,充分挥发混匀后再转移部分气体到无臭气袋的两步式配气方法。结果表明,2种配气方法的准确度不存在显著差异,但两步式配气法的配气稳定性明显优于传统方法。此外,研究还发现,常见异味物质在被注入气袋后3 min内便能完全挥发并混合均匀。除一些挥发性和吸附性极强的物质外,气袋内的异味物质气体浓度能在配好后20 min内基本保持不变。 Gas sample preparation is fundamentally important for odor tests and relative scientific research, and directly affects the precision of test results. The traditional way, triangle odor bag method, is to inject liquid standard reagents into a 3L odorless bag with micro-syringe. The fluctuation of sample volume can influence the precision and stability of sample preparation, which should be possibly reduced when preparing the odorants with low thresholds or samples at low concentration levels. In the present work, a two step preparation method was es- tablished by injecting standard reagents into a 100 mL glass syringe and then transferring part of the well volatil- ized and mixed gas into the odorless bag. The results showed no distinct difference of precisions between the two methods, but our two-step one showed better stability. At the same time, we found that ordinary odorants could completely volatilize and mix well within 3 min after being injected into odorless bags. The concentrations of o- dorants in the odorless bag kept constant in 20 min after preparation except for those with strong volatility and ad- sorptivity.
出处 《环境工程学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期4593-4596,共4页 Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering
基金 国家"863"高技术研究发展计划项目(2012AA030302) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(20877008 21277011) 新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-09-0218) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金项目(FRF-TP-10-004B FRF-BR-11-017B) 北京市自然科学基金资助项目(8092021)
关键词 三点比较式臭袋法 异味测试 配气 浓度 triangle odor bag method odor test gas sample preparation concentration
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1GB/T14675-93空气质量恶臭的测定三点比较式臭袋法.
  • 2GB14554-93,恶臭污染物排放标准.
  • 3王元刚,包景岭,翟增秀,邹克华.中日恶臭污染管理方式比较及其借鉴[J].环境保护,2011,39(2):95-96. 被引量:9
  • 4金青哲,王树刚.蚕蛹新鲜度的研究[J].食品科技,2003,(11):77-78,85.
  • 5Hanajima D. , Kuroda K. , Morishita K. , et al. Key odor components responsible for the impact on olfactory sense during swine feces composting. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(7) : 2306-2310.
  • 6Ueno H. , Amano S. , Merecka B. , et al. Difference in the odor concentrations measured by the triangle odor bag meth- od and dynamic olfactometry. Water Science and Technolo- gy, 2009, 59(7) : 1339-1342.
  • 7王玫.三点比较式臭袋法测定环境中臭气浓度[J].环境监测管理与技术,2007,19(4):54-55. 被引量:20
  • 8Abraham M. , Sanchez-Moreno R. , Cometto-Muniz J. , et al. An algorithm for 353 odor detection thresholds in hu- mans. Chem. Senses, 2012, 37(3) : 207-218.
  • 9Cometto-Muniz J. , Cain W. , Abraham M. , et al. Con- centration-detection functions for the odor of homologous n- acetate esters. Physiology & Behavior, 2008, 95 (5) : 658-667.
  • 10Dincer F. , Odabasi M. , Muezzinoglu A. Chemical char- acterization of odorous gases at a landfill site by gas chro- matography-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 2006, 1122(2) : 222-229.

二级参考文献63

共引文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部