期刊文献+

血清胱抑素C在重度烧伤患者急性肾损伤诊断中的价值 被引量:3

Serum cystatin C as an early biomarker for acute renal injury in severe burn patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨血清胱抑素C(CysC)对严重烧伤患者早期肾功能损害的预测价值。方法入选重度烧伤患者56例,测定入院第2天及第7天血清CysC、肌酐(Scr)等指标。采用24 h尿肌酐清除率(24h-CrCl)作为参考肾小球滤过率(rGFR),分别采用Cockcroft-Gault公式、中国成人简化MDRD公式、基于CysC的GFR估算公式和CysC联合Scr公式计算估测的GFR(GFR CG、GFR C-MDRD、GFR CysC和GFR C-CysC+Scr),分析各公式估测的GFR与rGFR的一致性。结果 GFR CysC与rGFR的一致性优于GFR CG和GFR C-MDRD,但差于GFR C-CysC+Scr。结论在重度烧伤患者中,CysC是急性肾功能受损的敏感指标,利用血清CysC联合Scr估算GFR的准确性高于单纯基于Scr估算值。 Objective To evaluated the diagnostic significance of serum cystatin C (CysC) in accurate in acute renal function impairment in sever burn patients. Methods A total of 56 adult patients with major burn injury were enrolled. Renal function was assessed using SCr - based formulae ( GFRcc and GFRc_MDRD ) and CysC - based formulae (GFRCysC and GFRC-CysC+Ser ) on the second day and the seventh days post -burn. The 24 -h urinary creatinine clearance (24- hCrCl) was used as reference GFR (rGFR). The consistence between rGFR and estimated GFR was tested with Bland -Altman analysis. Results CysC -based formulae for estimated GFR was more accurate and sensitive for detection of impaired renal function than SCr - based formulae. The combination of CysC and Scr for estimated GFR was most accurate. Conclusion CysC is a more accurate and sensitive marker in identification of acute impaired renal function in major burn patients than Scr.
出处 《广东医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第20期3130-3133,共4页 Guangdong Medical Journal
基金 广东省医学科研基金资助项目(编号:B2012343) 广东省佛山市医学类科技攻关项目(编号:201208227)
关键词 烧伤 胱抑素C 肾小球滤过率 肌酐 burn cystatin C glomerular filtration rate serum creatinine
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献41

  • 1Vikas RD, Charles K, Gary S. Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: A Meta-analysis [ J ]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2002, 40(2): 221-6.
  • 2Magdalena M, Mark JS, Lesley AS. Serum cystatin C as a marker of glomerular filtration rate [J]. Current Opinion Nephrol Hypertension, 2006, 15:610-6.
  • 3Knight EL, Verhave JC, Spiegelman D, et al. Factors influencing serum cystatin C levels other than renal function and impact on renal function measurement [ J ]. Kidney Int, 2004, 65:1416-21.
  • 4Ma YC, Zuo L, Chen JH, et al. Improved GFR estimation by combined creatinine and cystatin C measurements [J]. Kidney Int, 2007, 72: 1535-42.
  • 5王海燕.王梅译.美国NKF-K/DOQI工作组.慢性肾脏病及透析的临床实践指南[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.
  • 6Gates G E. Split renal function testing using ^99mTc-DTPA: a rapid technique for determining differential glomerular filtration [J ]. Clin Nucl Med, 1983, 8: 400-7.
  • 7Stevens LA, Zhang Y, Schmid CH, et al. Evaluating the performance of equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate [ J ]. J Nephrol, 2008, 21: 797-807.
  • 8Grubb A, Bjork J, Lindstrom V, et al. A cystatin C based formula without anthropometric variables estimates glomerular filtration rote better than correlation clearance using the Cockroit-Gault formula [J]. Scand J Clin Lab, 2005, 65: 153-62.
  • 9Hojs R, Bevc S, Ekart R, et al. Serum cystatin c-based equation compared to serum creatinine-based equations for estimation of glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic kidney disease [J ]. Clin Nephrol, 2008, 70(1): 10-7.
  • 10Grubb A, Nyman U, Bjork J, et al. Simple cystatin C-based prediction equations for glomerular filtration rate compared with the modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation for adults and the Schwartz and the Counahan-Barratt prediction equations for children [J]. Clin Chem, 2005, 51: 1420-31.

共引文献20

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部