期刊文献+

桡骨远端骨折78例疗效分析 被引量:8

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较保守治疗与手术治疗治疗桡骨远端骨折的疗效。方法按治疗方法,78例桡骨远端骨折患者分为两组:保守治疗组46例,手术治疗组32例。比较骨折愈合时间及骨折愈合后掌倾角、尺偏角、桡骨高度和腕关节功能Dienst评分。结果随访6-12个月,所有患者均获得骨折愈合,无骨筋膜室综合征、压疮、正中神经损伤、感染等并发症。保守治疗组骨折愈合时间短于手术治疗组,但手术治疗组在掌倾角、尺偏角及桡骨高度恢复方面优于保守治疗组(P<0.05);治疗后6个月,保守治疗组腕关节功能优良率为60.9%,明显低于手术治疗组的84.4%(P<0.05)。结论桡骨远端骨折保守治疗与手术治疗各有利弊。保守治疗倾向于小创伤、可接受的腕关节解剖结构与功能恢复;手术治疗存在相对较大创伤的同时具有更佳的腕关节解剖结构与功能恢复,因此在决定治疗方案时需多方权衡,合理选择。
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第21期2637-2638,共2页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Kilie A,Ozkaya U, Kabukcuoglu Y, et al. The results of non- surgical treatment for unstable distal radius fractures in elderly patients[J]. Aeta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 2009,43 (3) : 229 234.
  • 2Dienst M,Wozasek GE, Seligson D. Dynamic external fixation for distal radius fraetures[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1997, (338):160-171.
  • 3Knox J, Ambrose H, MeCallister W, et at. Pereutaneous pins versus volar plates for unstable distal radius fractures: a biome- ehanie study using a cadaver model [J]. J Hand Surg(Am), 2007,32(6) .. 813-817.
  • 4熊学华,许月莲,王克刚,郭新辉,胡晓林,蔡伟斌.桡骨远端骨折不同治疗方法临床疗效比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(16):1221-1223. 被引量:59
  • 5徐子涵,刘智.桡骨远端骨折的治疗[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2009,11(5):480-483. 被引量:10

二级参考文献39

  • 1蔡桦,卢耀明,李钊,魏合伟,乔荣勤,张文财,张志海,颜祖侠.动力性外固定支架和小夹板外固定治疗桡骨远端不稳定性骨折疗效比较[J].中医正骨,2004,16(12):6-8. 被引量:36
  • 2杨明,张殿英.桡骨远端骨折的疗效评估方法及预测疗效的因素分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(6):459-460. 被引量:44
  • 3王纪亮,许建中.桡骨远端骨折治疗进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(16):1260-1262. 被引量:101
  • 4Margaliot Z, Haase SC, Kotsis SV, et al. A meta-analysis of outcomes of external fixation versus plate osteosynthesis for unstable distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg(Am), 2005, 30:1185-1199.
  • 5Grewal R, Perey B, Wilmink M, et al. A randomized prospective study on the treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures: open reduction and internal fixation with dorsal plating versus mini open reduction, percutaneous fixation, and external fixation. J Hand Surg (Am), 2005, 30:764-772.
  • 6Wright TW, Horodyski M, Smith DW. Functional outcome of unstable distal radius fractures: orif with a volar fixed-angle tine plate versus external fixation. J Hand Surg (Am), 2005, 30: 289-299.
  • 7Rein S, Schikore H, Schneiders, et al. Results of dorsal or volar plate ixation of AO type C3 distal radius fractures: a etrospective study. J Hand Surg (Am), 2007, 32: 954-961.
  • 8Trease C, Mclff T, Toby EB. Locking versus nonlocking t-plates for dorsal and volar fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg(Am), 2005, 30: 756-763.
  • 9Jaremko JL, Lambert RG, Rowe BH. Do radiographic indices of distal radius fracture reduction predict outcomes in older adults receiving conservative treatment? Clin Radiol, 2007, 62: 65-72.
  • 10Young BT, Rayan GM. Outcome following nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in low-demand patients older than 60 years. J Hand Surg (Am), 2000, 25: 19-28.

共引文献67

同被引文献81

引证文献8

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部