期刊文献+

棘突间CoflexTM非融合固定的临床应用及疗效分析 被引量:1

Clinical application and efficacy analysis of non-fusion fixation using interspinous implantation CoflexTM
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价棘突间Coflex非融合固定治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床效果及应用前景。方法对腰椎管狭窄症121例采用后路双侧椎板开窗减压,棘突间Coflex非融合固定手术。其中119例行单节段棘突间Coflex固定,2例行双节段棘突间Coflex固定。结果 121例术后症状均得到明显改善,平均手术时间40.24 min,平均失血量51.43 ml;术前下腰椎JOA评分平均为13.62分,术后为25.06分;术前ODI评分平均为67.36%,术后为14.33%;术前腰痛VAS评分为7.89分,术后为2.01分;术前腿痛VAS疼痛评分平均为8.44分,术后为1.22分。结论应用双侧椎板开窗减压,棘突间Coflex非融合固定治疗腰椎管狭窄症具有良好的近期临床疗效。 Objective To investigate the short-term clinical outcome of non-fusion technique using a kind of interspinous implantation Coflex treatment for lumbar spine degenerative diseases. Methods A total of 121 cases of stenosis or lumbar disc herniation were evaluated. Of which, 119 cases were implanted a single segmental interspinous Coflex fixation while 2 cases were implanted two segmental interspinous Coflex fixations. Results All cases achieved fairly good clinical outcome. The average operation time was 40.24 rain, and the average blood loss was 51.43 ml. The mean JOA score was 13.62 points preoperative while 25.06 points postoperative, the mean ODI score was 67.36% preoperative while 14.33% postoperative, the mean VAS score in low back pain was 7.89 points preoperative while 2.01 points postoperative, and the mean VAS score in leg pain was 8.44 points preoperative while 1.22 points postoperative. Conclusion The application of interspinous implantation Coflex treatment for lumbar spine stenosis showed fairly good short-term clinical outcome.
出处 《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》 2013年第11期1010-1012,共3页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
基金 卫生部医药卫生科技发展计划项目(W2012ZT58)
关键词 COFLEX 非融合 棘突间固定 腰椎管狭窄症 Coflex Non-fusion Interspinous implantation Lumbar stenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献49

共引文献84

同被引文献14

  • 1Harrop JS ,Youssef JA, Maltenfort M, et a/. Lumbar adjacent segmentdegeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty [J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2008,33(15):1701-1707.
  • 2Kong DS, Kim ES, Eoh W. One-year outcome evaluation after inter- spinous implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis with segmental instability[J]. J Korean Med Sci,2007,22(2):330-335.
  • 3Kelly MP, Mok JM,Berven S. Dynamic constructs for spinal fusion: an evidence -based review[J]. Orthop Clin North (Am), 2010,41 (2) : 203-215.
  • 4Glaser J,Stanley M,Sayre H,et al. A 10-year follow-up evaluation of lumbar spine fusion with pedicle screw fixation[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) ,2003,28(13): 1390-1395.
  • 5Tsai K J, Murakami H, Lowery GL, eta/. A biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous device (Coflex) used to stabilize the lumbar spine [J]. J Surg Orthop Adv,2006,15(3): 167-172.
  • 6Kabir S,Gupta S, Casey A. Lumbar interspinous spacers:a systemat- ic review of clinical and biomechanical evidence[j]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2010,35(25) :E1499-1506.
  • 7Celik H,Derincek A,Koksal I. Surgical treatment of the spinal stenosis with an interspinous distraction device:do we really restore the foraminal height?[J]. Turk Neurosurg ,2012,22(1) : 50-54.
  • 8Davis R,Auerbach JD,Bae H ,eta/. Can low-grade spondylolisthe- sis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized,prospective,muhicenter US investigational device exemption trial :clinical article[J]. J Neu- rosurg Spine ,2013,19(2) : 174-184.
  • 9Carragee EJ,Han MY,Suen PW,et al. Clinicl outcomes after lum- bar discectomy for sciatica:the effects of fragment type and anular competence[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 2003,85-A(1) : 102-108.
  • 10Moojen WA,Arts MP,Bartds P,.H,et a/. F_/fectivene~ of inter- spinous implant surgery in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication:a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Eur Spine J,2011,20(10): 1596-1606.

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部