期刊文献+

图书馆成本效益分析实施方法的原理和应用效果分析 被引量:4

The Principle and Application Effect Analysis of the Methods for Implementing Cost-benefit Analysis of Libraries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于公共预算压力,图书馆需要通过经济价值评估证明其存在价值。成本效益分析和经济影响分析是经济价值评估的主要方法,由于经济影响分析的局限,图书馆一般采用成本效益分析。本项研究论述了成本效益分析三种实施方法的原理,并基于国外图书馆成本效益分析的实证案例,对三种实施方法的效度进行比较分析。研究发现:①条件价值法、消费者剩余法和时间价值法的评估结果之间的数量关系;②条件价值法、消费者剩余法和时间价值法的效度排序;③推荐国内各类图书馆宜采用的评估实施方法。 For the increasing pressure on the library budgets, libraries need to prove their existing value through evaluating the monetary value. Cost-benefit analysis and economic impact analysis are the major methods for estimating the economic value, libraries usually adopt cost-benefit analysis due to the limitations of economic impact analysis. This study expounded the principles of three methods for implementing cost- benefit analysis, and comparatively analysed the validity of the three methods based on several empirical applications from foreign libraries. Findings: (1)The quantitative relations among the valuation results of contingent valuation method, consumer surplus method and time value method; (2) The validity rank of contingent valuation method, consumer surplus method and time value method; (3) Which methods should be adopted by each kind of domestic libraries for implementing cost-benefit analysis.
作者 叶斌
出处 《图书馆杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第11期9-15,共7页 Library Journal
关键词 图书馆 成本效益分析 条件价值评估 消费者剩余法 时间价值法 Library, Cost-benefit analysis, Contingent valuation method, Consumer surplus method,Time value method
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Svanhild Aab0. Libraries and return on investment(ROI): a meta-analysis[J]. New Library World, 2009,110(7):311-323.
  • 2Donald S Elliott, Glen E Holt, Sterling W Hayden,Ledie Edmonds Holt. Measuring your library,svalue: How to do a cost-benefit analysis for yourpublic library[M]. Chicago: American LibraryAssociation, 2007:11.
  • 3杜苹.基于投人产出模型的公共阁书馆经济影响评价研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2011:44-46.
  • 4Giyeong Kim. A critical review of valuation studiesto identify frameworks in library services[J]. Library& Information Science Research, 2011(33):112-119.
  • 5郭庆旺,赵志耘.公共经济学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2005.55-65.
  • 6Venkatachalam L. The contingent valuation method:a review[J]. Environmental Impact AssessmentReview, 2004, 24(1):89-124.
  • 7Davis R K. The value of outdoor recreation: aneconomic study of the maine woods[D]. Cambridge:Harvard University, 1963.
  • 8Arrow K, Solow R, Portney P, Learner E, Radner R,chuman H. Report of the NOAA panel on contingentvaluation[H]. Federal Register, 1993, 58(10):4016-4614.
  • 9Carson R T, Wright J, Carson N, Alberini A, Flores N.A bibliography of contingent valuation studies andpapers[R]. San Diego: National Resource DamageAssessment, 1995.
  • 10British Library. Measuring our value, London,2004[OL].[2012-12-11].http://www.bl.uk/pdf/measuring.pdf.

共引文献21

同被引文献20

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部