摘要
由于公共预算压力,图书馆需要通过经济价值评估证明其存在价值。成本效益分析和经济影响分析是经济价值评估的主要方法,由于经济影响分析的局限,图书馆一般采用成本效益分析。本项研究论述了成本效益分析三种实施方法的原理,并基于国外图书馆成本效益分析的实证案例,对三种实施方法的效度进行比较分析。研究发现:①条件价值法、消费者剩余法和时间价值法的评估结果之间的数量关系;②条件价值法、消费者剩余法和时间价值法的效度排序;③推荐国内各类图书馆宜采用的评估实施方法。
For the increasing pressure on the library budgets, libraries need to prove their existing value through evaluating the monetary value. Cost-benefit analysis and economic impact analysis are the major methods for estimating the economic value, libraries usually adopt cost-benefit analysis due to the limitations of economic impact analysis. This study expounded the principles of three methods for implementing cost- benefit analysis, and comparatively analysed the validity of the three methods based on several empirical applications from foreign libraries. Findings: (1)The quantitative relations among the valuation results of contingent valuation method, consumer surplus method and time value method; (2) The validity rank of contingent valuation method, consumer surplus method and time value method; (3) Which methods should be adopted by each kind of domestic libraries for implementing cost-benefit analysis.
出处
《图书馆杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第11期9-15,共7页
Library Journal
关键词
图书馆
成本效益分析
条件价值评估
消费者剩余法
时间价值法
Library, Cost-benefit analysis, Contingent valuation method, Consumer surplus method,Time value method