期刊文献+

超声造影结合粗针活检诊断甲状腺结节的临床应用价值 被引量:3

Clinical value of combined contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with core-needle biopsy in diagnosis of thyroid nodules
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨超声造影结合粗针活检诊断甲状腺结节的临床应用价值。方法回顾超声造影结合超声引导下粗针活检(core-needle biopsy,CNB)诊断甲状腺结节81例患者共89个结节的超声检查资料和粗针活检病理资料,最后与手术病理结果对照分析。结果超声造影诊断甲状腺良恶性结节的敏感性为86.7%、特异性为95.8%、准确性为91.0%。超声引导下粗针活检取材成功率100%,与手术病理结果符合率98.9%。结论超声造影技术诊断甲状腺结节具有较高的临床价值,结合应用超声引导下粗针穿刺活检可全面准确、安全、简便的诊断甲状腺疾病,值得在临床加以推广应用。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with ultrasonography-guided core-needle biopsy (US-guided CNB) of thyroid nodules. Methods Contrast- enhanced ultrasound and US-guided CNB were performed in a total of 89 nodules from 81 patients. All ultrasound findings and pathological results of both needle biopsies and surgical specimens were reviewed. Results The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound were 86.7% ,95.8% ,and 91.0% respectively in differentiation between benign and malignant thyroid nodules. US-guided CNB could get almost all the lesions. Nearly 98.9% of the pathological results of needle biopsies were in accordance with these of surgical specimens. Conclusion Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is effective in detecting malignant thyroid nodules. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with US-guided CNB is an accurate, safe and simple diagnostic method for differentiating thyroid diseases, and which is worthy to recommend widely.
出处 《岭南现代临床外科》 2013年第5期424-426,共3页 Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery
关键词 超声造影 粗针穿刺活检 甲状腺结节 Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Core-needle biopsy Thyroid nodules
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献22

  • 1Papini E,Guglielmi R,Bianchini A,et al.Risk of malignancy in nonpalpable thyroid nodules:predictive value to ultrasound and color-Doppler features.J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2002,87(5):1941-1946.
  • 2Jun Peter,Chow LC,Jeffrey RB,et al.Pictorial essay:the sonographic features of papillary thyroid carcinomas.Ultrasound Q,2005,21(1):39-45.
  • 3Catalano O,Nunziata A,Lobianco R,et al.Real-time harmonic contrast material-specific US of focal liver lesions.Radiographics,2005,25(2):333-349.
  • 4Averkiou M,Powers J,Skyba D,et al.Ultrasound Contrast Imaging Research.Ultrasound Q,2003,19(1):27-37.
  • 5Bartolotta TV,Midiri M.Runza G,et al.Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of solitary thyroid nodules with contrast-enhanced ultrasound:initial results.Eur Radiol,2006,16(10):2234-2241.
  • 6Delellis RA,Lloyd RV,Heitz PU,et al.Pathology and genetics of tumors of endocrine organs.World health organization classification of tumors.Lyon:International Agency for Research on Cancer Press,2004:49-133.
  • 7Frates MC,Benson CB,Charboneau JW,et al.Management of thyroid nodules detected at us Socitety of radiologists in ultrasound consensus conference statement.Radiology,2005,237(3):794-800.
  • 8Lannuccilli JD,Cronan JJ,Monchik JM.Risk for malignancy of thyroid nodules as assessed by sonographic criteria:the need for biopsy.J Ultrasound Med,2004,23(11):1455-1464.
  • 9Sugimoto H,Kaneko T,Hirota M,et al.Earlier hepatic vein transit-time measured by contrast ultrasonography reflects intrahepatic hemodynamic changes accompanying cirrhosis.J Hepatol,2002,37:578-583.
  • 10Albrecht T,Biomley MJK,Urbank A.Doppler quantification with Levovist infusion in vivo-a linear dose response relationship.Radiology,1997,205(P):337-345.

共引文献95

同被引文献38

  • 1李杰,董宝玮,于晓玲,王兴华.肝不同部位灰阶超声造影定量分析的实验研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2004,13(6):460-462. 被引量:29
  • 2Khati N, Adamson T, Johnson K, et al. Ultrasound of the thyroid and para thyroid glands. Ultr~sound Q, 2003,19(5) : 162-176.
  • 3Deng J, Zhou P, Tian SM, et al. Comparison of diagnostic effica- cy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, acoustic radiation force im- pulse imaging, and their combined use in differentiating focal solidthyroid nodules. PLoS One, 2014,9(3):e90674.
  • 4Cantisani V, Consorti F, Guerrisi A, et al. Prospective compar- ative evaluation of quantitative elastosonography. Eur J Radiol, 2013(82) : 1892-1898.
  • 5Nemec U, Nemec SF, Novotny C, et al. Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound after intravenous administration of a microbubble contrast agent for differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: Assessment of diagnostic accuracy. Eur RadioI, 2012,22(6) : 1357-1365.
  • 6Khati N, Adamson T, Johnson K, et al. Ultrasound of the thy- roid and parathyroid glands. Ultrasound Q, 2003, 19 ( 5 ) : 162 176.
  • 7Chan B, Desser T, Medougall I, et al. Common and uncommon sonographic t'eatures of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Ultra sound Med, 2003,22(9):1083 1090.
  • 8Frates M, Benson C, Charboneau J, et al. Management of thy- roid nodules detected at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultra- sound Consensus Conference Statement. Ultrasound Q, 2006,22 (18):239-240.
  • 9Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Hocke M, et al. Pitfalls and artefacts using contrast enhanced ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol, 2011,49 (3) :350-356.
  • 10Bartolotta TV, Midiri M, Galia M, et al. Qualitative and quan- titative evaluation of solitary thyroid nodules with contrast-en- hanced ultrasound: Initial results. Eur Radiol, 2006, 16 (10) : 2234-2241.

引证文献3

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部