期刊文献+

Ⅱ Ⅲ型食管胃结合部癌腹腔镜根治术与传统根治术疗效的临床比较 被引量:3

Clinical analysis of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy (LRG) and traditional open radical surgery (TORS) in treating Ⅱ Ⅲ type gastroesophageal junction cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨比较Ⅱ、Ⅲ型食管胃结合部癌腹腔镜根治术与传统开腹癌根治术的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2009年7月至2011年7月行根治性手术的食管胃结合部恶性肿瘤病例200例,患者均为Ⅱ、Ⅲ型食管胃结合部恶性肿瘤。所有病例均随机选择,接受腹腔镜手术组100例,传统手术组100例,比较两组手术一般情况、病理学资料、术后并发症、复发或转移率等方面的差异。所有数据均采用SPSS 13.0软件进行统计分析,计量资料采用t检验,计数资料采用卡方检验,P<0.05表示有统计学意义。结果腔镜组[(220±45)min]手术时间长于传统组[(140±26)min](t=15.382,P<0.001),但术中出血量[(140±89)ml比(220±58)ml],术后腹腔引流总量[(110±83)ml比(223±92)ml]及术后吗啡用量[(12.2±2.6)mg比(21.3±3.2)mg]均明显少于传统组(t=7.525、t=9.120、t=22.087,P<0.001)差异有统计学意义。两组术后住院时间、淋巴结清扫数目、术后并发症发生率、同期复发转移率(t=0.488、χ2=0.038、χ2=0.687、χ2=0.199,P>0.05)差异无统计学意义。结论Ⅱ、Ⅲ型食管胃结合部癌腹腔镜根治术安全、可行与传统开放癌根治术相同的治疗效果。 Objective The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome between laparoscopic radical gastreetomy (LRG) with traditional open radical surgery (TORS) in treating Ⅱ Ⅲ type gastroesophageal junction cancer. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed from July 2009 to July 2011. In total, 200 patients with type Ⅱ Ⅲ gastroesophageal junction cancer in our hospital were enrolled, which were divided randomly into LRG group ( 100 cases) and TORS group ( 100 eases). Clinical data in 2 groups, including general data of operation, pathologic results, postoperative complications, recurrence or metastasis rate were compared. SPSS 13.0 software was employed for the statistical analysis. Measurement data used t test and count data used chi-square test. P 〈 0.05 was considered as statistical significance. Results The average operation time in LRG group [ ( 220 ± 45 ) rain ] was longer than that in TORS group [ (140 ±26)mini, with significant difference (t = 15. 382, P 〈0. 001 ). However, blood loss ( ( 140 ± 89) ml vs. (220 ± 58 )ml), postoperative peritoneal drainage fluid volume [ (110 ± 83 )ml vs. (223 ± 92 ) ml ] , and postoperative morphine consumption [ ( 12.2 ± 2.6 ) mg vs. ( 21.3 ± 3.2 ) mg ] was less than conventional surgery group ( t = 7. 525, t = 9. 120, t = 22. 087 respectively, P 〈 0. 001 ). No significant diffrence was observed in the postoperative hospital stay ( t = 0. 488, P 〉 0.05 ). Number of lymph node dissection (χ^2 = 0. 038, P 〉 0.05 ) and postoperative complications (χ^2 = 0. 687, P 〉 0.05 ) was not significantly different. It was no significant difference in the postoperative recurrence rate over the same period (χ^2 = 0. 199, P 〉 0.05) for the two methods. Conclusion LRG is safe and feasible in treating Ⅱ Ⅲ type gastroesophageal junction cancer, with similar clinical outcome of TORS.
出处 《中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)》 2013年第4期48-51,共4页 Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 食管胃接合处 肿瘤 腹腔镜检查 Esophagogastric junction Neoplasms Laparoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献121

共引文献892

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部