1Authors Guild v, Google Inc. 05 Civ. 8136 CS. D. N.Y. Nov. 19,2009.
2See H. Lund Christiansen,The Nordic Licensing Systems— extended Collective Agreement Licensing, 13 E. I. P. R. 9,1991.
3SeeHoward P. Knopf, Copyright Collectivity in the Canadian Academic Community; An Alternative to the Status Quo. IntellectualProperty Journal,1999 — 2000.
4SeeJane C. Ginsburg, Reproduction of Protected Works for University Research or Teaching, 39 Journal of the Copyright Society ofthe U. S. A.,Spring, 1992.
5SeeDaniel Gervais,Collective Management of Copyright: Solution or Sacrifice. 34 Columbia Journal of Law the Arts 591,Sum-mer, 2011.
6SeeChristian Rydning, Extended Collective Licences - the Compatibility of the Nordic Solution with the International Conventionsand EC Law 11 .2010),p. 7.
7See Jia Wang, Should China Adopt an Extended Licensing System to Facilitate Collective Copyright Administration: PreliminaryThoughts, 32 E. I. P. R. 6,2010.
8See Brianna Dahlberg, The Orphan Works Problem: Preserving Access to the Cultural History of Disadvantaged Groups,SouthernCalifornia Review of Law Social Justice, Spring, 2011.
9Robert Alexy,A Theory of Constitutional Rights,trans. by Julian Rivers,Oxford University Press,2002, p. 33,p. 75.
10SeeSheldon H. Nahmod, Artistic Expression and Aesthetic Theory: The Beautiful, the Sublime and the First Amendment, 1987Wis. L. Rev. 221(1987).
