期刊文献+

声触诊组织定量技术凸阵和线阵超声探头评价肝实质弹性一致性比较 被引量:1

Comparison of virtual touch tissue quantification for measurements of liver stiffness bteween convex and linear ultrasound transducer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对31例慢性肝炎患者和45例健康志愿者行4C1和9L4探头检测肝实质剪切波速度(SWV)。对照组和慢性肝炎组4C1缺失值出现率均低于9L4,4C1对照组和慢性肝炎组缺失值出现率、9L4对照组和慢性肝炎组缺失值出现率差异均无统计学意义;对照组和慢性肝炎组4C1检测SWV均小于9L4;对照组4C1和9L4组内相关系数(ICC)较低,慢性肝炎组4C1和9L4的ICC一般;Bland-Altman分析4C1和9L4探头SWV差值的均数对照组和慢性肝炎组分别为-0.85和-0.64。目前声触诊组织定量(VTQ)技术4C1和9L4探头测量肝实质弹性一致性较差。 Shear wave velocity (SWV) was performed in 31 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHBs) and 45 healthy volunteers (control group). The occurrence rate of absence data with 4C1 was lower significantly than with 9IA transducer both in CHBs and control group. The occurrence rate of absence data in the CHBs was not different from that in healthy controls with 4C1 transducer, which also could be seen when using 9L4 transducer. The SWV were significantly higher with 9IA than 4C1 transducer both in control group and in CHBs. For SWV measurements performed by 4C1 and 9L4 transducer, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in the CHBs and control group were classified as poor and fair agreement. Bland-Ahman analysis compared the differences against mean of SWV measured by 4C1 and 9L4 transducer for the CHBs and control group were at - 0. 85 and - 0. 64, respectively. VTQ in its present stage of development has low agreement between 4C1 and 9L4 transducer in the assessment of liver stiffness.
出处 《安徽医科大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第12期1536-1539,共4页 Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui
基金 安徽省高等学校省级自然科学研究项目(编号:KJ2013Z151)
关键词 超声检查 探头 声触诊组织定量 一致性 ultrasonography transducer virtual touch tissue quantification agreement
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献60

  • 1陈卉.Bland-Altman分析在临床测量方法一致性评价中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2007,24(3):308-309. 被引量:217
  • 2Fahey BJ, Nightingale KR, Nelson RC, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of the abdomen : demonstration of feasibili- ty and utility. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2005,31(9):1185-1198.
  • 3Palmeri ML, Wang MH, Dahl JJ, et al. Quantifying hepatic shear modulus in vivo using acoustic radiation force. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2008,34(4) : 546-558.
  • 4Scheuer PJ. Classification of chronic viral hepatitis : a need for re- assessment. J Hepatol, 1991,13 (3) : 372-374.
  • 5Keeffe EB, Dieterich DT, Han SH, et al. A treatment algorithm for the management of chronic hepatitis B virus in the United States : an update. Clin Gastroenteroi .Hepatol, 2006,4 (8) : 936 -962.
  • 6Bedossa P, Dargere D, Paradis V. Sampling variability of liver fi- brosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology, 2003, 38 (6) : 1449- 1457.
  • 7Regev A, Berho M, Jeffers LJ, et al. Samping error and intraob- server variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV inlet tion. Am J Gastroenterol, 2002,97(10):2614-2618.
  • 8Lupsor M, Badea R, Stefanescu H, et al. Analysis of histopatho logical changes that influence liver stiffness in chronic hepatitis C Results from a cohort of 324 patients. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2008, 17(2) :155-163.
  • 9Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S. Liver biopsy. NEngl J Med 2001; 344: 495-500.
  • 10Abdi W, Millan JC, Mezey E. Sampling variability on percu- taneous liver biopsy. Arch Intern Med 1979; 139: 667-669.

共引文献163

同被引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部