期刊文献+

基于ABM模型的企业低碳行为管理模式转变分析 被引量:4

A Study on Low Carbon Oriented Firm Behavior Management Based on ABM Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文首次分析了低碳化与传统企业行为管理结合的动机,系统地分析了低碳化企业行为管理的研究进展,分别从技术进步、企业异质性特征以及企业生产环节和成本效益函数角度总结分析了现有文献中关于低碳化企业行为管理的研究特征。基于新古典经济学理论,构建了低碳化发展政策对企业行为影响的ABM(Agent-Based Modeling)模型,并结合对电力企业的问卷调查,对ABM模型进行了实证分析。结果显示,环境管制政策对大企业的C02减排效果影响最为明显,并将促进大企业经济效益的提高;但是,对小企业的C02减排效果影响相对较弱,并将对小企业的经济效益产生不利影响。 This paper looks into the motive of integration of low-carbon economy and firms' behavior management for the first time, and analyzes comprehensively the current studies of low-carbon oriented firms' behavior management from the perspective of technical progress, enterprises heterogeneity, enterprises production and benefit function. Based on the theory of neoclassical economics, we construct an agent-based modeling (ABM) to illustrate theoretically the impact of low-carbon development policy on firms' behavior. Moreover, we make an empirical analysis based on the questionnaire of electric power firms. The results show that environmental regulation policies have important positive effects on CO2 emission reduction and performance improvement for large enterprises. While small enterprises suffer negative impacts in economic performance as well as the comparatively limited effect of CO2 emission reduction.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第10期91-99,共9页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71073053)
关键词 低碳政策 企业行为管理 ABM模型 CO2排放 low-carbon economy development, enterprises behavior management, agent-based modeling, CO2 emission
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Engau C., Hoffmann V. H. Effects of Regulatory Uncertainty on Corporate Strategy -- An Analysis of Firms,Responses to Uncertainty about Post-Kyoto Policy [J]. Environmental Science Policy, 2009,12(7):766-777.
  • 2杨德锋,杨建华,楼润平,姚卿.利益相关者、管理认知对企业环境保护战略选择的影响——基于我国上市公司的实证研究[J].管理评论,2012,24(3):140-149. 被引量:44
  • 3朱庆华,杨启航.中国生态工业园建设中企业环境行为及影响因素实证研究[J].管理评论,2013,25(3):119-125. 被引量:13
  • 4Downing P. B.,White L. J. Innovation in Pollution Control[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1986,13(1):18-29.
  • 5Atkinson E. Scott, Halvorsen, Robert. The Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Firms in a Regulated Environ-ment: The Case of U.S. Electric Utilities[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1986,29(3):281-294.
  • 6Harford J. D. Firm Behavior under Imperfectly Enforceable Pollution Standards and Taxes [J]. Journal of Environ-mental Economics and Management, 1978,5(1):26-43.
  • 7Linder S., McBride M. Enforcement Costs and Regulatory Reform: The Agency and Firm Response[J]. Journal ofEnvironmental Economics and Management, 1984,11 (4):327-346.
  • 8Riveiro D. Environmental Policy and Commercial Policy: The Strategic Use of Environmental Regulation [J]. Eco-nomic Modelling, 2008,25(6):1183-1195.
  • 9Yong Liu. Investigating External Environmental Pressure on Firms and Their Behavior in Yangtze River Delta ofChina[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009,17( 16): 1480-1486.
  • 10Richard F. H.,Peter M. K. Optimal Input Substitution of a Firm Facing an Environmental Constraint [J]. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research, 1997,99(2):336-352.

二级参考文献209

共引文献576

同被引文献102

引证文献4

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部