期刊文献+

产品规划中工程特性的竞争优先度分析 被引量:3

Competition priority analysis of engineering characteristics in product planning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为充分反映质量差构建过程中信息的模糊性,提出基于区间型语义信息的工程特性竞争优先度确定方法。引入信息论的思想分析了各项工程特性的竞争性,依据竞争性评价信息构建优化模型并通过拉格朗日函数进行求解,以确定工程特性的竞争性系数;使用转换函数将区间型语义信息转化为模糊互补判断矩阵,进一步采用行和归一化方法得到工程特性改进的合理性系数与可行性系数;依据层次分析法,获取工程特性的竞争性系数、合理性系数和可行性系数的相对重要度,最后给出了工程特性竞争优先度的计算公式。以圆锥破碎机的改进为例,验证了方法的可行性和有效性。 To reflect information vagueness in building process, a determination method for competition priority ofECs was presented based on interval linguistic information. The idea of information theory was introduced to analyze the competitiveness of ECs. An optimization model was set up according to competitive preference values, and Corn-petitive Coefficients (CCs) of ECs was obtained by using Lagrange function to solve the model. A transformation function was utilized to change interval linguistic information into complementary judgment matrix, and the normal- ized rank aggregation approach was used to get Improvement Rationality Coefficients (IRCs) and Improvement Prac- tical Coefficients (IPCs) of ECs. According to analytic hierarchy process, the relative importance degree of CCs, IRCs and IPCs was obtained, and a computational formula of ECs' competition priority was proposed. An illustra tive example of a cone crusher was used to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach.
出处 《计算机集成制造系统》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第10期2562-2571,共10页 Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70971017)~~
关键词 质量功能展开 工程特性 竞争优先度 区间型语义信息 圆锥破碎机 产品设计 quality function deploymentl engineering characteristics competition priority ratings interval linguisticinformatiom cone crusher~ product design
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献51

  • 1王美清,唐晓青.一种面向产品规划过程的组合质量屋[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2004,30(7):652-656. 被引量:36
  • 2崔勇,孙枫.基于模糊群决策的质量屋方案选择模型[J].中国机械工程,2007,18(7):807-811. 被引量:13
  • 3李延来,唐加福,姚建明,蒲云.质量功能配置中工程特性最终重要度的确定方法[J].机械工程学报,2007,43(4):178-186. 被引量:5
  • 4李延来,唐加福,蒲云,姚建明.质量功能展开中顾客需求的排序算法[J].计算机集成制造系统,2007,13(6):1196-1203. 被引量:26
  • 5CHAN L K, WU M L. Prioritizing the technical measures in quality function deployment [J].Quality Engineering, 1998, 10(3) :467-469.
  • 6PARK T, KIM K J. Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality [J]. Journal of Operations Management, 1998, 16(5):569-581.
  • 7WANG J. Fuzzy outranking approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment [J].International Journal of Production Research, 1999, 37(4):899-916.
  • 8KARSAK E E. Fuzzy multiple objective programming framework to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2004, 47(2/3):149-163.
  • 9CHEN L H, WENG M C. An evaluation approach to engineering design in QFD processes using fuzzy goal programming models[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 172(1) :230-248.
  • 10LIU S T. Rating design requirements in fuzzy quality function deployment via a mathematical programming approach [J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2005, 43(3) :497-513.

共引文献125

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部