期刊文献+

开放存取机构库综合评价模型研究 被引量:2

A Study on the Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Open Access Institutional Repository
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过分析机构库评价的主要影响因素和评价研究的难点后,结合机构库评价的实际情况,采用定性分析和定量分析相结合的层次分析法确定了评价指标体系的递阶层次结构;通过构造判断矩阵和计算组合权重,建立了机构库综合评价模型,并给出了依赖于指标层的目标评价公式;结合实际进行了评价验证。 By analyzing the main affecting factors and the difficulty in the evaluation of institutional repositories and the e- valuation studies, with the combination of the actual situation in the institutional repositories evaluation, using the combining AHP of the qualitative and quantitative analysis the evaluation index system of hierarchical structure has been determined; by eomtruet- ing the judging matrix and the computing combined weights, the index system of comprehensive evaluation model of institutional repository has been established, and the target depending on the index layer evaluation formula also has been given, which have been evaluated with the actual verification.
出处 《现代情报》 CSSCI 2013年第11期20-24,共5页 Journal of Modern Information
基金 甘肃省高等学校科研项目资助 甘肃省市(州)政府网站影响力评价研究的成果之一(项目编号:2013A-094)
关键词 开放存取 机构库 综合评价 层次分析法 open aeeem institutional repository eomprehemi'ce evaluation analytic hierarchy process
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献46

共引文献16

同被引文献86

  • 1韩珂,祝忠明.机构仓储可持续发展关键问题研究[J].图书情报工作,2008,52(5):99-102. 被引量:21
  • 2何燕,初景利,张冬荣.我国科研人员自存储态度调查--以中国科学院科研人员为例[J].图书情报工作,2008,52(5):121-124. 被引量:28
  • 3柯平,王颖洁.机构知识库的发展研究[J].图书馆论坛,2006,26(6):243-248. 被引量:91
  • 4洪梅,马建霞.开源机构库软件可用性评估方法的探讨[J].现代图书情报技术,2007(12):6-10. 被引量:8
  • 5Bjrk B C, Iamkso M, Welling P, et al. Anatomy of green open access [ J ]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014,65 ( 2 ) : 237 - 250.
  • 6Open Society Institute. A guide to institutional repository software [ R/OL]. [ 2015 - 01 - 17 ]. http ://www. budapestopenaccessini- tiative, org/pdf/OSI_Guide_to_IR_Software_v3, pdf.
  • 7Bankier J G, Gleason K. Institutional repository software compari- son[ EB/OL ]. [ 2015 - O1 - 31 ]. http ://disde. minedu, gob. pe/ xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/2899/Institutional% 20Repo sitory% 20Software% 20Comparison. pdf? sequence = 1.
  • 8Singh S K, Witt M, Dorothea S. A comparative analysis of institu- tional repository software [ C/OLd. [ 2015 - 02 - 26 ]. http:// www. orl0. es/Resources/documentos/GSabstracts/AComparative AnalysislnstitutionalRepositorySoftware. pdf.
  • 9Chan D L H, Kwok C S Y, Yip S K F. Changing roles of referencelibrarians: The case of the HKUST Institutional Repository [ J 1. Reference Services Review ,2005,33 ( 3 ) :268 - 282.
  • 10Jones R D. DSpace and ETD-db comparative evaluation[ R/OL]. [2015 -02 -26 ]. http://www, era. lib. ed. ac. uk/bitstream/ 1842/169/1/ComparativeEvaluation. pdf.

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部