由斯皮瓦克命题到福柯命题——中国参与式发展话语的国家化被引量：2

From Spivak's Question to Foucault's Question——Nationalization of Participatory Development in China

下载PDF

导出

摘要随着20世纪90年代国际援助产业在中国的兴起,参与式发展在国内掀起了一阵强势的话语风潮。作为对斯皮瓦克命题的回应,参与式发展宣扬通过赋权来让村民实现自己的发展。本文通过对一份参与式扶贫项目手册的分析来透视中国参与式发展项目背后所潜在的整体运行机制,展现渗透于其中的国家的治理艺术。当斯皮瓦克命题转变为福柯命题后,我们的结论是:在中国的参与式发展话语中,并不是作为主体的村民在说话,真正说话的是村民背后的文化网络、制度网络,更是国家的权力网络。 Participatory development discourse has been prevalent in various fields, since the internation- al development industry emerged in the 1990s in China. Participatory development responding to Spivak＇ s Question advocates that local people achieve their own development in terms of empowerment. The focus of the paper is to reveal the working dynamics of participatory development project directed by government in China and understand the art of government involved in the project. Spivak＇ s Question is transformed into Foucauh＇ s Question： who is speaking Our conclusion is that it is not indigenous people but underlying cultural, institu- tional and power network who is speaking

作者孙睿昕叶敬忠

机构地区中国农业大学人文与发展学院

出处《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期44-50,共7页 Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

关键词参与式发展在场地方性知识权力再生产 participatory development presence local knowledge reproduction of power

分类号 C916.1 [经济管理] D035-01 [政治法律—政治学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献14

1杨小柳.地方性知识和发展研究[J].学术研究,2009(5):64-69. 被引量：16
2[法]米歇尔·福柯:《规训与惩罚》,刘北成、杨远婴译,北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2003年,第200页,第226页.
3朱晓阳.反贫困的新战略:从“不可能完成的使命”到管理穷人[J].社会学研究,2004(2):98-102. 被引量：42
4Hobart, Mark. (1995). The growth of ignorance, An an- thropological critique of development, London and New York : Routledge.
5[美]马格林.《农民,种子商和科学家:农业体系与知识体系》,载许宝强,汪晖.《发展的幻象》,北京:中央编译出版社,2000年版.
6[美]阿图罗·埃斯科瓦尔.《遭遇发展:第三世界的形成与瓦解》,叶敬忠,汪淳玉,吴慧芳等译,北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011年版.
7Kothari, Uma. "Power, Knowledge and Social Control in Participatory Development ", Cook, Bill & Kothari,Uma. Participation: the new tyranny? London: Zed Books, 2001.
8Li, Ania Murray. (2007), The will to improve: govern- mentality, development and the practice of politics, Dur- ham, NC : Duke University Press.
9Lummis, C. Douglas. Equality, Sachs, W. The Devel- opment Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power, Lon- don & New York: Zed Book, 1992.
10Cohen. Anthony P. "Segmentary knowledge : a whalsay skech", Hobart, Mark. An anthropological critique of development, London and New York : Routledge, 1993.

二级参考文献55

1黄育馥.将知识转化为行动──当代应用人类学家的追求[J].国外社会科学,1995(4):9-15. 被引量：5
2Crewe, Emma and Elizabeth Harrison. Whose Development? An Ethnography of Aid[M]. London and New York: Zed Book, 1989.
3Escobar, Artum. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World [M] . Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.
4Crush, Jonathan. Imaging Development [A] . In Power of Development [M] . Edited by Jonathan Crush, London: Routledge, 1995.
5Sachs, Wolfgang ed. The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power [M] . London and New York: Zed Book, 1992.
6Adams, W. M. Green Development Theory? Environmentalism and Sustainable Development [A] . In Power of Development [M] . Edited by Jonathan Crush, London: Routledge, 1995.
7Mackenzie, Fiona. Selective Silence: A Feminist Encounter with Environmental Discourse in Colonial Africa [A] . In Power of Development [M] . Edited by Jonathan Crush, London: Routledge, 1995.
8Escobar, Arturo. Anthropology and the Development Encounter:. the Making and Marketing of Development Anthropology [J] . Current Anthropology Vol. 18 (4), 1996.
9Ferguson, James. The Anti-politics Machine: "Development", Depoliticization and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho [M] . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
10Apffel-Marglin, Frederique. Technology and the Reproduction of Values in Rural Western India [A] . In Dominating Knowledge: Development, Culture and Resistance [M] . Edited by Frederique Apffel-Marglin and Stephen A. Marglin. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.