期刊文献+

朝贡与条约的紧张关系——以欧美列强与日本对中韩朝贡关系的态度变化为中心 被引量:2

The Strained Relations Between “Paying Tribute” and “Treaty”——Centering on the European and American powers' attitude change on China and South Korea's tribunary relations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 条约与朝贡之紧张关系,洵为理解19世纪末中韩关系近代转型过程之关键。欧美列强及明治日本固然坚持近代条约关系,以排斥与否定中韩传统朝贡关系,其实际外交立场仍依现实利害关系而有所变化。1866年丙寅洋扰之际的法国与1871年辛未洋扰之际的美国,相继否定中韩传统朝贡关系以禁阻清政府干涉,进而以侵略朝鲜行动而予以武力之冲击。至1876年与1882年,明治日本与美国则分别以条约明文有意否定了中韩传统朝贡关系。至1885年以来巨文岛事件之际,英国甚至不惜代纳朝鲜对华朝贡以获取清政府外交支持,俄国亦欲签订协议承认中国宗主权,以保障其在朝鲜利益,日本外务卿井上馨则向李鸿章提交《朝鲜办法八条》,试图承认中韩传统朝贡关系而实现对华合作方针,应可称之为"参入"性利用态度。所谓"条约取代朝贡"说反映到19世纪末中韩关系史,实为复杂曲折之动态进程,有待进一步深入探讨。 The strained relations between "paying tribute" and "treaty" is the key to understanding the modern transformation process of China and South Korea' s relations in the late 19th century. European and American powers and Meiji Japan insists on the modern treaty relations to reject and deny the traditional tribunary relations between China and South Korea. Their actual diplomatic position still varies according to the real interest relations. France at the time of 1866 and the US at the time of 1871 rejected in succession the traditional tribunary relations between China and South Korea to inhibit the intervention of the Qing Dynasty and then used force to invade Korea. In 1876 and 1882 respectively, Meiji Japan and the US rejected the tradtional tribunary relations between China and South Korea by a treaty. At the time of Port Hamilton incident in 1885, Britain aimed to get support from the Qing Dysnasty at the expense of paying tribute to China for Korea. Russian also wanted to sign a treaty to approve of China's suzerainty to ensure its interests in Korea. Japan's foreign minister Inoue Kaoru submitted Eight Clauses on Korea to Li Hongzhang in an attempt to admit the China and South Korea' s tribunary relations and realize cooperation with China. This can be called the "participation" attitude. The so-called " treaty replacing tribute" proposal showed the history of China and South Korea's relations in the late 19th century. This is a complex and dynamic process and waits to be explored further.
作者 权赫秀
出处 《聊城大学学报(社会科学版)》 2013年第6期1-12,共12页 Journal of Liaocheng University:Social Science Edition
关键词 条约 朝贡 欧美列强 日本 中韩传统关系 treaty~ tribute~ European and American powers, Japan, China and South Korea's traditionalrelations
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1张东夏.《法国对丙寅迫害的对应与占领江华岛事件》,载权熙英、李元淳、张东夏、赵珧.《丙寅洋扰的历史照明》,第71~72页.
  • 2权赫秀.《1871年辛未洋扰与中国清政府对应研究》,载权赫秀.《近代韩中关系史的再照明》,第51-77页.
  • 3《日本约章缮呈底稿折》,载吴汝纶编.《李文忠公全书》,《奏稿》卷18,台北:文海书店影印本,1962年,第47-50页.
  • 4No. 124, Burlingame to Seward, Peking, December 15th, 1866,转引自朴日根.《美国的开国政策与韩美外交关系》,第26-27页.
  • 5张岩,黄定天.近代中、日、朝“被迫开国条约”之比较[J].社会科学战线,2010(9):244-246. 被引量:1
  • 6《赋予与朝鲜的交涉全权及签订条约方针》,《近代韩国外交文书》第2卷,首尔:东北亚历史财团,2009年,第55-58页.
  • 7No. 37, Low to Fish, Peking, November 22th, 1870,转引自金源模.《近代韩美交涉史》,第238-239页.
  • 8金容九.《巨文岛与符拉迪沃斯托克19世纪韩半岛的畸形世界化过程》.
  • 9Granville to Tseng, Foreign Office, April 28th 1885,转引自金容九.《巨文岛与符拉迪沃斯托克-19世纪韩半岛的畸形世界化过程》,第76-77页.
  • 10《总署收出使英国大臣曾纪泽文》,载《清季中日韩关系史料》第4卷,第1826~1827页.

二级参考文献14

共引文献29

同被引文献26

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部