试论反邪教法的理论瓶颈及其突破——兼评《邪教的法律治理》

Theoretic Bottleneck of Anti-heresy Law and its Breakthrough——On Legal Governance of Heresy

邪教是否属于宗教?反邪教与宗教信仰是否冲突?如果两者不冲突又如何实现两者的"两全"?这些是我国反邪教法的理论瓶颈,也是我国在反邪教国际斗争中的软肋。刘正峰、周新国两位教授合著的《邪教的法律治理》在宗教事实评价标准基础上提出的邪教事实宗教说、国际宗教自由有限自由说及其反邪教立法建议,突破了我国反邪教法学的三大理论瓶颈,极大地推进了我国的反邪教法研究。

Is heresy one of religions Is anti-heresy in conflict with religion freedom？How can a satisfactory solution be found if there is no conflict between them.These problems are theoretic bottlenecks of anti-heresy law and also are a weak side in the international struggle of anti-heresy.Based on the evaluation standard of religious realities,Legal Governance of Heresy by Liu Zhenfeng and Zhou Xinguo,putting forward three points：realities of heresy,limited freedom of international religious freedom and legislative proposal for antiheresy law,has overcome three theoretic bottlenecks of anti-heresy law and promoted the study of anti-heresy law.