论虚假证据对全部诉讼请求的牵连后果——对虚假证据单一法律后果模式的反思

Involvement Consequence of False Evidence to the Action:Reflection upon Single Consequence of False Evidence

虚假证据是司法实践中常见的一种现象。在我国的立法和实践当中,当事人提供虚假证据的后果往往是惩戒性的罚款或拘留,而其在证据法上对整个诉讼的影响却没有规定,学界对此也没有研究。英国通过实践中的大量案例,对当事人提供虚假证据的行为确立了牵连规则,当事人提供虚假证据的行为可能会牵连其整个诉讼请求。牵连规则在伦理和实践上都具有正当性,值得我国证据法借鉴。

False evidence is a common phenomenon in judicial practice. In China＇s legislation and judicial prac- tice, the consequence of providing false evidence is often a fine or a detention, while the whole action is not affect- ed in civil evidence law and the legal circle never concerned with this question. Britain has established an involve- ment rule for the false evidence. Providing false evidence may implicate the entire claim. This rule is justified in both moral and practical grounds, and it is worth using for our reference.