摘要
神圣如"上帝"(God)者,也要接受理性的审视和追问,以探究"上帝"概念的内在融贯性,"因为荒谬,所以信仰"的时代已经远去。在历史上,先后提出过有关上帝的种种悖论,如伊壁鸠鲁悖论、全能悖论、全知悖论、恶和苦难问题、帕斯卡赌和克尔凯郭尔的神悖论,它们都被仔细阐释和初步评论。现有分析表明,"上帝"概念似乎具有某种"悖论"性质,很难在理性上自圆其说。
The conception of Holy God has to be questioned and examined by human reason in order to guarantee its internal coherence. The era of holding the tenet that we believe God because the conception of God is absurd has gone. In the past centuries, many paradoxes on God, such as Epicurean paradox, the paradox of omnipotence, the paradox of omniscience, the problem of evil and suffering,Pascal's Wager, and Kierkegaard's paradox of God, are carefully analysed and commented. Our analysis shows that the conception of God seems to be 'paradoxical' in its nature, and does not make sense in its rationality.
出处
《哲学分析》
2013年第5期62-74,198,共13页
Philosophical Analysis
基金
国家社科基金重点项目"分析哲学若干基本理论问题新探"(项目编号:12AZD072)和"描述论和直接指称论之争--回顾
批判与建构"(项目编号:12AZX008)的中期成果
关键词
伊壁鸠鲁悖论
全能悖论
全知悖论
恶和苦难问题
帕斯卡赌
克尔凯郭尔的神悖论
Epicurean paradox
the paradox of omnipotence
the paradox of omniscience
the problem of evil and suffering
Pascal's Wager
Kierkegaard's paradox of God