香兰素产业链3次对外反倾销的研究被引量：1

Do any MNCs' Collusive Effects Exist in Chinese Antidumping? A Case Study of Catechol-Benzofuranol-Vanillin Industry Chain

下载PDF

导出

摘要通过梳理研究反倾销措施经济效应的文献,并结合中国对外反倾销的实践,构建了跨国公司合谋效应的作用机制框架。文章以邻苯二酚/呋喃酚/香兰素产业链3次对外反倾销为研究对象,分析3次对外反倾销的贸易救济效果,对上述理论框架进行了检验。研究发现,跨国公司母公司与其子公司合谋通过贸易转移、贸易方式转变和投资跨越的方式规避了中国对外反倾销措施,证实了跨国公司合谋效应的存在。然后进一步剖析合谋效应的实现路径,最后讨论合谋效应的普遍性,并提出有针对性的应对措施。 Based on the current literature on economic effects of antidumping, and taking into account Chinese antidump-ing practices,this paper puts forward theoretical framework on the mechanism of MNCs＇collusive effects. Through the case study of the antidumping cases of Catechol-Benzofuranol-Vanillin industry chain, this paper analyzes their trade remedy effects,and tests the validity of the framework. The findings indicate that the MNCs circumvent Chinese anti-dumping measures by trade diversion, transformation of the trade mode and investment ＂jumping＂. So the existence of collusive effect is confirmed, then it further analyzes the path of collusion. Finally, it discusses the universality of collu- sion effect and proposes targeted response measures.

作者王分棉王建秀王玉燕

机构地区对外经济贸易大学国际商学院太原师范学院经济系

出处《中国软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第10期35-47,共13页 China Soft Science

基金国家自然科学基金重点项目(71332007) 北京社科项目(13JDJGC054) 中国博士后基金(2013M54098) 北京企业国际化经营研究基地资助 "对外经济贸易大学学术创新团队"资助项目对外经济贸易大学优秀博士学位论文培育基金

关键词对外反倾销跨国公司合谋效应产业链 antidumping MNCs collusive effects industry chain

分类号 F752 [经济管理—国际贸易]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献33

1Stiglitz. Dumping on Free Trade:The US Import Trade Laws [ J]. Southern Economic Journal, 1997,64(2) :402-424.
2冯宗宪,向洪金.欧美对华反倾销措施的贸易效应:理论与经验研究[J].世界经济,2010,33(3):31-55. 被引量：96
3Thomas J Prusa. The Trade Effects of U. S. Antidumping Actions [ C ]. MBER Working Paper, 1996,5440:1-20.
4沈国兵.美国对中国反倾销的贸易效应:基于木制卧室家具的实证分析[J].管理世界,2008,24(4):48-57. 被引量：63
5Robert W Staiger, Frank A Wolak. Measuring Industry Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States [ C ]. MBER Working Paper, 1994,4696 : 1-64.
6Corinne M Krupp, Patricia S Pollard. Market Responses to Antidumping Laws:Some Evidence from the U. S. Chemical In- dustry[ J]. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 1996,29 ( 1 ) : 199-227.
7Bruce A Blonigen, Chad P Bown. Antidumping and Retali- ation Threats [ J ]. Journal of International Economics, 2003,60 (2) :249 -273.
8鲍晓华.反倾销措施的贸易救济效果评估[J].经济研究,2007,42(2):71-84. 被引量：143
9Hylke Vandenbussche, Maurizio Zanardi. The Chilling Trade Effects of Antidumping Proliferation [ J ]. European Eco- nomic Review,2010,5 (6) :760-777.
10Jozef Konings, Hylke Vandenbussche, Linda Springa- el. Import Diversion under European Antidumping Policy [ J ] Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2001 ( 3 ) : 283-299.