5Acunzo G, Guida M, Pellicano M, et al. Effectiveness of autocross-kinked hyalumnic acid gel in the prevention of intra- uterine adhesions after hysteroseopic adhesiolysis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study[J]. Hum Pered, 2003, 18 (9):1918-1921.
2KITTIWATANAKUL W, WEERAKIET S. Comparison of efficacy of modified electric vacuum aspiration with sharp curettage for the treatment of incomplete abortion: randomized controlled trial [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2012, 38(4): 681-685.
3Chinese TITAPANT V, CHERDCHOOGIEAT P. Effectiveness of cefoxitin on preventing endometritis after uterine curettage for spontaneous incomplete abortion: a randomized controlled trial study[J]. J Med Assoe Thai, 2012, 95(11): 1372-1377.
4Hooker AB,Lemmers M,Thurkow AL,et al.Systematic review arid meta- analysis of intrauterine adhesions after miscarriage: prevalence,risk factors and long-term reproductive outcome.Hum Reprod Update,2014,20(2): 262-278.
5Morotti M,Podest & S,Musizzano Y,et al.Defective placental adhesion in voluntary termination of second-trimester pregnancy and risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2012, 25(4): 339-342.
6Shokeir TA,Fawzy M. The nature of intrauterine adhesionsfollowing reproductive hysteroseopie surgery determinedby early and late follow up hysterocopy : clinical implica-tions [J]. Arch Gme Obster,2008(277) :423-427.
7Johns DB, Keyport GM, Hoehler F,et al. Reduction ofpostsurgieal adhesions with intergel adhesion preventionsolution : a multieenter study of safety and efficacy afterconservation gynecologic surgery [J]. Fertil Steril,2001,76(3):595-604.
8Becker DE. Nausea,vomiting,and hiccups:a review of mec-hanisms and treatment [J]. Anesth Pmg,2010,57 (4):150-156.
9Acunzo G, Guida M, Pellicano M ,et al. Effectiveness ofautocross-kinked hyalumnic acid gel in the prevention ofintrauterine adhesions after hysteroseopie adhesiolysis :aprospeetive, randomized, controlled study [J]. Hum Pered,2003,18(9):1918-1921.
10Dilege E,Codam H. Prevention of adhesion to prostheticmesh in incisional velltral hernias : comparison of differ-ent barriers in an experiment-talmodel [J]. Surg TecholInt,2005,14(7) :185-190.
