从话语权看冲突性话语中的人际化线索被引量：14

On interpersonalized clues in business conflict interactions: From a perspective of discourse power

导出

摘要冲突话语在人际交际中在所难免。交际者在运用话语策略和应对冲突时体现了交际双方的思维活动和逻辑思辨的规律,冲突话语语用选择可体现交际中的人际化线索、交际者的话语认同和对人际冲突事件的认知。文章以商务谈判话语为语料,以福柯的"话语权"为理论基础,以冲突话语模式为切入点,探讨不同商务人际关系下的冲突话语位置、主体性质以及它们与话语权利和权力的关联,分析冲突的事件维度、实践维度和存在维度。论文从语篇分析的层面揭示出冲突话语中的人际化线索是人际话语学的理论框架构建的重要组成部分,是人际话语认同的平衡点。 Conflict interactions are inevitable in interpersonal communication. Interactants apply their intelligence and logic patterns to manage conflicts by using proper speeches, linguistic devices, which reflects proper interpersonalized clues, interactants' discourse identification and cognition of conflict resolution. Based on Foucault's(1980) theory of 'Discourse Power', this paper studies interpersonal discourse modes of conflict interactions, discourse power / right and their interconnections with the elements of the said discourse and their positions by using authentic business negotiation data; it also analyzes the event, praxis and existence dimensions from discoursal elements and finds that the interpersonalized clues, as the balancing factors, are essential for the theoretical construction of interpersonal communication discourse and interpersonalized discourse identification.

作者杨文慧

机构地区广东外语外贸大学

出处《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期371-378,438,共8页 Modern Foreign Languages

基金广东省哲学社会科学"十二五"规划项目"话语和谐-不和谐取向的社交语用研究"(GD12CWW08)的阶段性成果广东外语外贸大学外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心的资助

关键词冲突话语话语认知话语权力(利) 人际化线索

分类号 H313 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献25

1Corsaro, W. A. & T. A. Rizzo. 1990. Disputes in the peer culture of American and Italian nursery- school children A]. In A. D. Grimshaw (ed.). Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations C]. Carmbdirge: Cambridge University Press, 21-66.
2Foucault, M. 1980. Power Knowledge: Selected Interview and Other Writings [M]. New York: Pantheon.
3Grimshaw, A. D. (ed.). 1990. Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigation in Conversation C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4Lein, L. & D. Brenneis. 1978. Children's disputes in three speech communities [JJ. Language in Society 7 : 299-309.
5Muntigl, P. & W. Turnbull. 1998. Conversational structure and lacework in arguing I J]. Journal of Pragmatics 29: 245-256.
6Norrick, N. R. & A. Spitz. 2008. Humor as a resource for mitigating conflict in interaction IJ]. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 1661-1686.
7Petraki, E. 2005. Disagreement and opposition in multigenerational interviews with Greek- Australian mothers and daughters EJ]. Text 2: 269-303.
8Schifferin, D. 1985. Everyday argument: The organization of diversity in talk [A]. In T. A. van Dijk (ed.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol 13: Discourse and Dialogue [C]. London: Academic Press, 35-46.
9Scollon, R. & S. W. Scollon. 2001. Intercultural Communication : A Discourse Approach [ M ]. Oxford: Blackwell.
10Stein, N. L. & E. R. Albro. 2001. The origins and nature of arguments: Studies in conflict understanding, emotion, and negotiation I J]. Discourse Processes 2, 3: 113-133.