期刊文献+

富民才能强国的经济学内在逻辑 被引量:13

On Ecnomic Inherent Logic of Prospering the Nation through Enriching Its People
原文传递
导出
摘要 根据经济机制设计理论的基本原理,从个体自利性和信息不对称性两个客观现实出发来考察,任何一项改革或制度安排的成功执行都必须同时满足两个基本条件:参与性约束条件和激励相容约束条件,这也是正确处理好"改革、发展与稳定"的良性互动关系,从而实现富民强国的逻辑起点。富民强国的内涵在于,富民是实现社会动态稳定的必要条件,富民才能实现更高水平的经济可持续发展。富民优先命题的背后,实质是公权力与私权力的边界划分问题,其内在逻辑是"欲富民,需赋私权;保私权,需限公权"。根据这一逻辑,对中国过去三十多年的改革实践进行解读,可以进一步推演出政府职能转变和深化市场化改革的结论。中国改革实践所取得的巨大成就,也正是源自遵循了这一基本内在逻辑,而发展过程中出现的种种问题恰恰是源自对内在逻辑的违背。从这个角度而言,中国经济奇迹的创造并没有特殊性和例外性。 By the basic principles in economic mechanism design theory and from the objective reality of self-interest and information asymmetry, a successful implementation of any reform or institutional arrangement should satisfy both participation and incentive compatibility constraints, which is the logical starting point of a positive interactive relationship among "reform, development and stability" for achieving a prosperous nation with wealthy people. Behind the priority of enriching the people lies the boundary issue between public power and private power, and its inherent logic is "to enrich the people, private rights must be given, and to protect private rights, public power must be limited". ]gased on this argument and an analysis of China' s reform practice over the past 30 years, the conclusion of transformation of government functions and further deepening of market-oriented reform is reached. The great achievements or the problems in China's reform stem essentially from following or violating this basic inherent logic. From this perspective, China's economic miracle bears no special and exceptional nature.
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第11期65-74,共10页 Academic Monthly
基金 上海市哲学社会科学规划课题“和谐社会构建、现代市场制度完善与政府治理模式创新”(2011BJL002) 上海财经大学“211”工程四期建设项目的阶段性成果
关键词 富民强国 信息不对称 激励相容 prospering the nation through enriching its people, information asymmetry, incentive compatibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献61

  • 1田国强.中国国营企业改革与经济体制平稳转轨的方式和步骤——中国经济改革的三阶段论[J].经济研究,1994,29(11):3-9. 被引量:24
  • 2田国强.现代经济学的基本分析框架与研究方法[J].经济研究,2005,40(2):113-125. 被引量:293
  • 3Aghion, Philippe and Howitt, Peter, 1992,"A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction", Econometrica, 60(2), pp. 323-351.
  • 4Alesina, Alberto and Rodrik, Dani, 1994, "Distributive Politics and Economic Growth", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), pp. 465-490.
  • 5Banerjee, Abhijit V. and Duflo, Esther,2003,“Inequality and Growth: What can the Data say?”, Journal of Economic Growth, 8(3), pp. 267-299.
  • 6Benabou, Roland, 1996, "Inequality and Growth", in Ben S. Bernanke and Julio J. Rotemberg, eds., NBER Macroeconomics Annual. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 11-74.
  • 7Benabou, Roland,2002, “Tax and Education Policy in a Heterogeneous-agent Economy: What levels of Redistribution Maximize Growth and Efficiency?”, Econometrica, 70(2), pp. 481-517.
  • 8Benhabib, J. and A. Rustichini, 1996, "Social Conflict and Growth", Journal of Economic Growth, 1, pp. 129-146.
  • 9Benjamin, Dwayne, Loren Brandt and John Giles, 2004, “The Dynamics of Inequality and Growth in Rural China: Does Higher Inequality Impede Growth?” working paper, University of Toronto.
  • 10Berg, A. and Sachs, J, 1988,“The Debt Crisis: Structural Explanations of Country Performance.”, Journal of Development Economics, 29, pp. 271-306.

共引文献325

同被引文献136

引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部