期刊文献+

药品试验数据保护与专利保护之平行并存性研究 被引量:11

Parallel and coexisting research of drug trial data protection and patent protection
原文传递
导出
摘要 依据《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》第39条第3款的规定,世界上很多国家都实施了药品试验数据保护,并使之成为了与专利保护平行并存的重要的药品知识产权保护手段之一。然而二者平行并存的合理性以及产生的负面效应也是备受质疑。本文在对药品专利保护和试验数据保护进行深入理论分析的基础上,对二者平行并存的合理性进行探讨,并提出降低药品专利保护和试验数据保护并存的负面效应的应对措施,对正确解读药品试验数据保护的内涵和意义以及完善相关立法具有一定的借鉴意义。 Based on the provisions of the article 39.3 of TRIPS, many countries have implemented drug trials data protection, and making it an important means of pharmaceutical intellectual property protection parallel to and coexisting with the patent protection. However, the rationality and the negative effects of the parallelism and coexistence of the two protections are also being questioned. In this paper we theoretically analyzed drug trial data protection and patent protection, explored the rationality and put forward the countermeasures to reduce the negative effects of the parallelism and coexistence of the two protections. This paper provided references for the correct inter- pretation of meaning and significance of drug trial data protection and the improvement of relevant legislation.
出处 《中国新药杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第22期2600-2606,2615,共8页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs
基金 国家社会科学基金(13CFX086) 四川医事卫生法治研究中心青年基金(YF13-Q01)
关键词 药品 试验数据保护 专利保护 平行 并存 drug trials data protection patent protection parallelism coexistence
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1European Parliament.Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2001/83/EC[EB/OL].(2013-06-30).http://www.edctp.org/fileadmin/documents/ethics/DIRECTIVE_200183_ EC_OF_THE_EUROPEAN_PARLIAMENT.pdf.
  • 2IFPMA.A review of existing data exclusivity legislation in selected countries-fifth revised version[EB/OL].(2013-06-25).http://www.ifpma.org/documents/NR2799/Data Exclusivity_2012.pdf.
  • 3刁天喜,武士华.药品数据保护的现状与作用分析[J].军事医学科学院院刊,2007,31(2):160-162. 被引量:10
  • 4曼鹿.新药研发,借力CRO[J].医药世界,2005(6):56-57. 被引量:9
  • 5美国Tufts药品开发研究中心.多数成果走不出实验室,药业难解“囚徒困境”[J].中华医学信息导报,2003,18(14):56.
  • 6陈庆.药品试验数据专有权与药品专利权冲突之研究——从药品可及性角度谈起[J].知识产权,2012,22(12):56-61. 被引量:7
  • 7U.S.Food and Drug Administration.Orange Book:Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations[EB/OL].(2013-06-25).http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/default.cfm.
  • 8国家知识产权局.专利审查指南[EB/OL].(2013-07-12).http://www.sipo.gov.cn/zlsqzn/sczn2010.pdf.
  • 9LIANG BA.Regulating follow-on biologics,44[J].Harv J On Legis,2007,44(2):367-378.
  • 10IROHT M.All costs,no benefits:how the US-Jordan free trade agreement affects access to medicines[J].J Gene Med,2009,6(3):206-217.

二级参考文献17

  • 1张晓萌,邱家学.药品数据保护在我国的发展探讨[J].中国药房,2005,16(21):1606-1608. 被引量:9
  • 2.《药品注册管理办法》[EB/OL].www.sfda.gov.cn[EB],.
  • 3国家知识产权局.关于征求对《中华人民共和国专利法修订草案》(征求意见稿)意见的通知[EB/OL].http:www.sipo.gov.cn/sipo/tz/gz/20060808/P020060808327106040484.pdf.2006-07-31
  • 4Encouragement of new clinical drug development:the role of data exclusivity[R].International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA),2000.
  • 5A review of existing data exclusivity legislation in selected countries.Fifth revised version[R].International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA),2005.
  • 6《中华人民共和国药品管理法实施条例》.http://www.sfda.gov.cn
  • 7CARUSO AJ. The Experimental use exception : an experimentalist's view[J]. Albany Law Rew, 2005,25(14) : 217 -218.
  • 8TAUCHNER P. Experimental use in germany: comments on the german supreme court decision " clinical tests Ⅱ" [ J]. AIPPI J, 2002,23(10) : 83 -84.
  • 9Pharmaceutical Industry Profile, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA),2003: 2.
  • 10Jonathan de Ridder, Data Exclusivity: Further Protection for Pharmaceiticals[M], Aliens Arthur, Robinson Law Firm, June 2003: 2.

共引文献39

同被引文献123

引证文献11

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部