期刊文献+

大学生体育“三自主”选课倾向重要程度比较研究

Comparative Research of Significant Tendencies of College Student Selecting “Three-Factor Autonomous” Selective Physical Education Courses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从大学生三自主选课的倾向性入手,利用模糊数学、类比、卡方检验等方法对定性指标进行判定.结果表明,按模糊数学方法用分值和权重判定自主选课3个定性指标均为"非常重要".按学生对自主选课的6种组合形式重要程度判定,前3种组合分别是选项目、时间、教师组合;选时间、项目、教师组合;选项目、教师、时间组合.按学生对3个定性指标认知偏离程度判定,自主选课偏离教师程度最高、偏离项目程度较低、偏离时间程度最低.从而为高校体育自主选课建设提供了依据. Through interviewing experts, questionnaires, and quantified analysis with fuzzy mathematical, comparison, and chi-square test, this paper investigates students' tendencies in selecting "three antonymous en- gagements" P. E. courses. The results indicate : by means of fuzzy mathematics, it is found on the basis of score and weight that 3 factors are all highly significant ; student perception is analyzed on the basis of grouping by 6 com- binations of the three factors, where the first 3 are "program, timing, teacher", "timing, program, teacher" and "program, teacher, timing", and judging by skew the data of student perception demonstrate, autonomous course selection is the most skewed from "teacher", relatively less skewed from "program" and the least skewed from "timing". This research provides evidences for the construction of selective P. E. courses.
出处 《洛阳师范学院学报》 2013年第11期99-101,共3页 Journal of Luoyang Normal University
基金 洛阳师范学院重点教改项目(20101025)
关键词 体育 三自主选课 倾向 重要程度比较 "three-factor autonomous" selective courses tendency comparison of significance
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1教育部.全国普通高等学校体育课程教学指导纲要[z].体教艺[2002]13号,附件6.
  • 2马红霞.西安科技大学体育课“三自主”教学改革现状分析[J].体育学刊,2010,17(2):78-80. 被引量:13
  • 3吴望名,陈永义,黄金丽,等.应用模糊数学及方法[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1985:20-30.
  • 4张厚粲,徐建平.现代心理学与教育统计学[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2004:301-303.

二级参考文献9

共引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部