期刊文献+

院前肌肉注射与静脉注射治疗癫痫持续状态的疗效对比 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察院前肌注咪达唑仑与静脉注射劳拉西泮在治疗癫痫持续状态(SE)患者的疗效。方法选择2012年5月—2012年11月院前癫痫持续状态患者70例,完全随机化分成A(肌肉注射)组与B(静脉注射)组。A组36例肌肉注射10mg咪达唑仑后静脉注射安慰剂,B组34例肌肉注射安慰剂后静脉注射4mg劳拉西泮。观察记录抵达急诊室前抽搐停止的患者病例数、住院治疗病例数、收住重症监护病房的病例数、急性气管插管和急性复发例数。结果两组收住抵达急诊室前抽搐停止、住院、重症监护、急性气管插管和急性复发数比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论肌肉注射咪达唑仑和静脉注射劳拉西泮对院前癫痫患者持续状态是同样安全有效的。
出处 《中西医结合心脑血管病杂志》 2013年第11期1338-1339,共2页 Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine on Cardio-Cerebrovascular Disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献17

  • 1杜丽君,陶拉娣,贾丽芳,孙晓俐.咪达唑仑治疗儿童癫痫持续状态及惊厥频繁发作的临床研究[J].中国药物与临床,2005,5(9):669-671. 被引量:13
  • 2胡亚美,江载芳,诸福棠.实用儿科学.第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:1962-1963.
  • 3Izurieta R.Rabatin JT.Sedation during mechanical ventila tion:a systematic rleview[J].Crit Care Med,2002,30(12):2644-264.
  • 4杨宝蜂主编.药理学.第6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.130-132.
  • 5Hideto Y,Sawako Y,Tokinari A. Midazolam as a first - line agent for status epileptieus in children. Brain Dev ,202,22:239 - 242.
  • 6陈灏珠.实用内科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997.858.
  • 7Gavin Morrison,Elizabeth Gibbons,William Patrick Whitehouse.High-dose midazolam therapy for refractory status epilepticus in children[J]. Intensive Care Medicine . 2006 (12)
  • 8Robert C. Tasker.Midazolam for refractory status epilepticus in children: higher dosing and more rapid and effective control[J]. Intensive Care Medicine . 2006 (12)
  • 9Koul R,Chako A,Javed H,et al.Eight-year study ofchildren status epilepticus:midazolam infusion in managementand outcome. Journal of Child Neurology . 2002
  • 10Hayashi K,Osawa M,Aihara M,et al.Efficacy of intravenous mid-azolam for status epilepticus in childhood〔J〕. Pediatric Neurology . 2007

共引文献24

同被引文献22

  • 1Trinka E, H0fler J,Z,erbs A,et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous valproate for status epilepticus: a systematic review[J]. CNS Drugs,2014,28(7) :623-639.
  • 2Upreti C, Otero R, Partida C, et al. Altered neurotrans mitter release, vesicle recycling and presynaptic structure in the pilocarpine model of temporal lobe epilepsy[J]. Brain,2012,135(Pt3) :869 -885.
  • 3Reddy DS,Kuruha R. Experimental models of status epi lepticus and neuronal injury for evaluation of therapeutic interventions[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2013, 14 (9): 18284- 18318.
  • 4Ferguson M, Bianchi MT, Sutter R, et al. Calculating the risk benefit equation for aggressive treatment of non-con- vulsive status epileptieus[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2013, 18 (2) :216-227.
  • 5Drexel M, Preidt AP,Sperk G. Sequel of spontaneous sei zures after kainic acid-induced status epilepticus and asso- ciated neuropathological changes in the subiculum and en- torhinal cortex[J]. Neuropharmacology,2012,63(5) :806- 817.
  • 6Kozhemyakin M, Rajasekaran K, Todorovie MS, et al. So matostatin type 2 receptor activation inhibits glutamate release and prevents status epilepticus[J]. Neurobiol Dis, 2013,54(6) : 94-104.
  • 7吴永忠,盛学梅,余连芝,欧阳科.咪达唑仑治疗小儿惊厥性癫痫持续状态34例疗效观察[J].中国实用医药,2010,5(14):172-173. 被引量:12
  • 8罗小春,韦国强,万梅珍,陈娟.咪达唑仑治疗癫痫持续状态的临床疗效[J].浙江临床医学,2010,12(12):1319-1320. 被引量:9
  • 9胡海立,杨静,李天佐.咪达唑仑用于顽固性癫痫灶切除术患者苏醒期的临床观察[J].重庆医学,2011,40(19):1932-1933. 被引量:4
  • 10周桂芬,路新国,刘艳青,廖建湘.咪达唑仑持续静脉滴注治疗癫痫频繁发作65例疗效观察及护理[J].齐鲁护理杂志(上旬刊),2011,17(6):41-42. 被引量:6

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部