比较话语的不对称:尼采与道家

Asymmetry of the Comparative Discourse: Nitze and Taoist School

关于尼采与道家的比较话语,国内自上个世纪80年代以来长时期从现代精神上比较尼采与老庄思想,突出了双方打破传统、寻求个性解放的要旨。但是与此不同的是,西方从上世纪60～70年代开始,则更多地从后现代视域上探讨尼采与东方思想的接近,目的是为西方现代困局寻找救赎希望。在这个视域中,尼采实际上被看成是一个"反现代"的思想代表,并被作为后结构主义或后现代主义的先驱。笔者以为,要突破这种比较话语的不对称现象,就需要探讨尼采与道家思想深层的共通性。

As to the comparative discourse of Nitze and Taoist school, Chinese scholors has been comparing the thoughts of Nitze and thoughts of Laozi and Zhuangzi from the view of modern spirit since [980s. In this process, breaking the tradition and pursuing individual liberation are the gist. In contrast, in the west, the similarity between Nitze and eastern thoughts was discussed from the view of post-modern perspective, with the aim to find hope for modern predicament. In this perspective, Nitze was actually considered a representitive of anti-modern thoughts and pioneer of post-strueturalism and post-modernism. The author think that to break though this asymmetry of the comparative discourse, the intercommunity of both thoughts should be discussed.