不同社会两难环境下的个体决策行为研究——基于公共品和公共池塘资源实验的比较被引量：1

A Study of Individual Decision-Making Behavior in Different Social Dilemma Environment: Based on Experiment Comparison of Public Goods and Common Pool Resources

下载PDF

导出

摘要了解社会成员在不同的社会两难问题下的决策行为,有助于合理解决社会两难问题。尽管对于公共品和公共池塘资源问题已有大量理论和实证文献,然而缺乏对于这两类社会困境的比较。文章采用经济学实验的研究方法,对二次公共品和二次公共池塘资源这两类社会两难问题精心构造博弈实验环境,对被试在不同实验环境顺序下的决策行为进行了系统性比较,并据此得到一些有意义的实验启示。 Understanding social members under different social dilemma of decision-making behavior is helpful to solve the social dilemma. Although a large number of theoretical and empirical literature focus on the public goods and common pool resources, there is lacking of comparison between these two types of social dilemma. This paper uses experimental economics method, constructs these two types of social dilemma experimental environment, compares the decision-making behavior under different environment, and finds some valuable experimental implications.

作者刘建华郭锴鸣姜叶飞

机构地区闽南师范大学经济学系厦门大学经济学院

出处《生态经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第12期26-31,共6页 Ecological Economy

基金国家社会科学基金项目(10BJL027) 福建省社会科学规划项目(2011C047)

关键词社会两难公共品公共池塘资源实验经济学 social dilemma public goods common pool resources experiment economics

分类号 F062.6 [经济管理—政治经济学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1Ledyard J O. Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research in Handbook of Experimental Economics [M]. New Jersey: Princeton Universily Press, 1995:111-194.
2Ostrom El. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collectiw- Action [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
3Camerer C. Behavioral Game Theory [M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.
4Gintis H. Game Theory Evolving. A Problem-Centered Inlroducfion to Modeling Strategic -ateraction [M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
5Samuelson P. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1954, 36: 387-389.
6Musgrave R A. The Theory of Public Finance [M]. New York: MacGraw-Hill. 1959.
7Musgrav,- R A. Provision for Social Goods. In Public Economics [A]// Margolis J, Guitton H. Public Economics [M]. London: McMillan, 1969: 12.-,-144.
8Sandier T, Arce D G. Pure Public Goods versus Commons: Benefit cost Duality [J]. Land Economics, 2003, 79: 355-368.
9Brewer M B. Kramer R M. Choice Behavior in Social Dilemmas: Effects of Social Identity, Group Size, and Decision Framing [J]. Journal c,f Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 50: 543-549.
10Vandijk E, Wilke H. Coordination Rules in Asymmetric Social Dilemmas: a Comp-son between Pubic Good Dilemmas and Resource Dilemmas [J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1995, 31: 1-27.

二级参考文献73

1杜栋,顾继光.“公用地悲剧”的改进博弈分析[J].统计与决策,2005,21(06S):46-47. 被引量：4
2.《新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典》条目“Publi-c Goods(公共财货)”[A]..《新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典》第3卷[C].经济科学出版社,1996年12月.第1133页.
3李郡.[D].上海财经大学,.
4.《新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典》第3卷[M].经济科学出版社,1996年12月..
5亚当斯密著郭大力王亚南译.《国民财富的性质和原因的研究》[M].商务印书馆,1996年4月第7次印刷..
6休谟著关文运译.《人性论》[M].商务印书馆,1997年2月第8次印刷..
7Sadrieh, A., and Verbon, H.A.A., 2006, “Inequality, Cooperation, and Growth: An Experimental Study”, European Economic Review, 5: 1197-1222.
8Isaac, R.M., McCue, K., and Plott, C., 1985, "Public Goods Provision in an Experimental Environment", Journal of Public Economics, 26: 51-74.
9Isaac, R.M., and Walker, J.M., 1988b, “Group Size Effects in Public Goods Provision: The Voluntary Contribution Mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103 : 179-199.
10Isaac, R.M., Walker, J.M., and Williams, A., 1994, “Group Size and the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: Experimental Evidence Utilizing Very Large Groups”, Journal of Public Economics, 54: 1-36.