期刊文献+

SAS宏程序在自动获得多于24小时动态血压监测整体谷峰比中的应用 被引量:1

Application of SAS procedures in evaluation of trough/peak ratio in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:为避免手动处理多于常规动态血压监测数据所造成的错误,采用SAS宏程序自动获得动态血压数据整体谷峰比。方法:使用SAS软件中相关语句自动生成处理多于常规动态血压监测数据的宏程序。结果:将原始数据输入SAS程序中,运行宏可以获得服药后24h内每小时的整体水平血压差值,并且最终得到试验组和对照组整体降压谷峰比。结论:利用宏程序可以处理超出药后24h的动态血压监测数据,并最终生成临床医师所需要的谷峰比。 AIM: To explore the SAS macros implementation of trough/peak in ambulatory blood pressure with different kinds of records. METHODS: Implying procedure retain, SQL and cycling do, create macro procedure output ring statistical analysis report forms. RESULTS: After checked data entered into the SAS proce dure, average difference of blood pressure values per hour in 24 hours after drug administration was created when running the macros. Thewhole trough/peak ratios oftreatment and con trol groups were finally calculated. CONCLU SION: Trough/peak ratio required by clinician could be obtained by using macros dealing with ambulatory blood pressure with records excee ding 24 hours after taking medicine.
机构地区 中国医学科学院
出处 《中国临床药理学与治疗学》 CAS CSCD 2013年第11期1246-1250,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
关键词 动态血压 谷峰比 SAS实现 Ambulatory blood pressure Trough/peak ratio SAS implementation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献73

共引文献620

同被引文献15

  • 1Preiss D, Fisher J. A measure of confidence in Bland-Airman analysis for the interchangeahility of two methods of measurement[J]. J Clin Monit Comput, 2008,22 (4) : 257-259.
  • 2Sedgwick P. Limits of agreement (Bland-Altman method)[J]. BMJ ,2013,346:f1630.
  • 3Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers:Evaluation of measurement error 2: Dahlberg's er- ror, Bland-Altman method, and Kappa coefficient [J]. Restor Dent Endod,2013,38(3) :182-185.
  • 4Zaki R, Bulgiba A, Ismail R, et al. Statistical methods used to test for agreement of medical in- struments measuring continuous variables in method comparison studies: a systematic review[J]. PLoS One,2012,7(5) : e37908.
  • 5Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for as- sessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement[J]. Lancet, 1986,1(8476) : 307-310.
  • 6Woodman RJ. Bland-Altman beyond the basics: creating confidence with badly behaved data [J]. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol,2010,37(2):141-142.
  • 7Bland JM. How can I decide the sample size for a study of agreement between two methods of meas- urement [ EB/OL]? http://www-users. york. ac. uk/-mb55/meas/sizemeth. htm, 12 January, 2004.
  • 8Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreed statistics: measure- ment method comparison [ J ]. Anesthesiology, 2012,116(1) :182-185.
  • 9Stockl D, Rodriguez CD, Van Uytfanghe K, et al. Interpreting method comparison studies by use of the bland-altman plot: reflecting the importance of sample size by incorporating confidence limits and predefined error limits in the graphic[J]. Clin Chem,2004,50(11) :2216-2218.
  • 10Eken C. Bland-Altman analysis for determining a- greement between two methods[J]. J Emerg Med, 2009,36(3) :307, 307-308.

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部