期刊文献+

论多方当事人合并仲裁的合意与技术 被引量:2

On the Parties' Consensus and Technology of the Consolidated Arbitration between Multi- parties
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于国际商业贸易的实际需要,多方当事人合并仲裁制度很有必要存在,主要的疑难问题在于,多方当事人之间基于多个合同发生的争议进行合并仲裁。在缺乏一个多方直接参与的明确仲裁协议的情况下,从仲裁立法、仲裁规则和仲裁协议层面来看,当事人合意推定基础之上的合并仲裁具有合理性。合并仲裁在具体的技术操作层面上,由仲裁机构或仲裁庭决定是否合并仲裁,并就仲裁庭的组成进行指定。当事人各方将合并仲裁的情况固定,或者由仲裁庭进行记录备案,有助于合并仲裁裁决的承认与执行。 Based on the actual needs of the international business trade, consolidated arbitration between multi - parties is necessary. One of the main problems is the consolidated arbitration between multi -parties based on disputes arising from more than one contract. In the absence of a definite arbitration agreement directly involved by multi- parties, the consolidated arbitration based on the parties' constructive agreement is reasonable, from the perspective of the arbitration legislation, arbitration rules and arbitration agreement. From the technology of the consolidated arbitration, the arbitration institution or arbitral tribunal are eligible to decide the consolidated arbitration issue, and specify the composition of the arbitral tribunal. Where the consolidated arbitration award is required to recognize and enforce abroad, the parties to the consolidated arbitration or the arbitration court should fix or record the consolidated arbitration documents.
作者 杜焕芳 陈娜
出处 《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期126-132,共7页 Journal of Northwest University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(12BFX137)
关键词 多方当事人合并仲裁 合并仲裁合意 公平原则 合并仲裁技术 consolidated arbitration between multi - parties consensus of consolidated arbitration principle of fairness technology of consolidated arbitration
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1李广辉,薛胜利.合并仲裁法律制度探究——兼论中国合并仲裁制度之构建[J].河北法学,2006,24(6):73-78. 被引量:13
  • 2JULIAN D M LEW,LOUKAS A MISTELIS,STEFAN M KR(O)LL.Comparative International Commercial Arbitration,[M].The Hague:Kluwer Law International,2003.
  • 3乔慧娟.合并仲裁问题探析[J].仲裁研究,2008(3):76-82. 被引量:4
  • 4GAILLARD E,SAVAGE J.Fouchard Gaillard Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration[M].The Hague:Kluwer Law International,1999.
  • 5克里斯托弗R.德拉奥萨,理查德W.奈马克.国际仲裁科学探索实证研究精选集[M].陈福勇,丁建勇,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2010.

二级参考文献3

共引文献14

同被引文献21

  • 1刘鑫,王晶.合意合并仲裁问题研究[J].法制与社会,2008(20):35-36. 被引量:1
  • 2李广辉,薛胜利.合并仲裁法律制度探究——兼论中国合并仲裁制度之构建[J].河北法学,2006,24(6):73-78. 被引量:13
  • 3See 2002 Statistical Report,14(1)ICC INT'L COURT OF ARBITRATION BULL. 8(Spring 2003).
  • 4Compania Espanola de Petroleus,S. A. V. Nereus Shipping,S. A. 527 F. 2d 966,(2d Cir. 1975)cert.denied,426 U. S. 936(1976).
  • 5United Kingdom v. The Boeing Company,998 F. 2d 68(2d Cir. 1993).
  • 6Glencore,Ltd. V. Schnitzer Steel Products Col 89 F. 3d 264(2d Cir. 1999).
  • 7Home Ins. v. New England Reinsurance Corp. No. 98-5772,1999 U. S. Dist.
  • 8Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds,Inc.,210 F. 3d 771(7th Cir. 2000).
  • 9Green Tree Financial Crop. v. Bazzle,539 U. S. 444(2003).
  • 10[意]莫鲁.鲁比诺.萨马塔诺.国际仲裁法律与实践[M].中信出版社,2003:297.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部