摘要
就科技期刊中数学公式转行问题,对GB/T7713—1987《科学技术报告、学位论文和学术论文的编写格式》中更新的两个标准GB/T 7713.1—2006《学位论文编写规则》和GB/T7713.3—2009《科技报告编写规则》进行了分析,并与GB/T 3102.11—1993《物理科学和技术中使用的数学符号》和GB/T 7713—1987进行了比较,指出了GB/T 7713.1—2006和GB/T7713.3—2009关于数学公式转行规定的优点和改进趋势。针对现有科技期刊数学公式转行执行多标准现象,提出了一些改进建议,并列举了一些不能转行的符号,希望能对GB/T 7713.2《学术论文编写》的修订提供参考。
For the mathematical formula line-shifting problem in sci-tech journals, the paper analyzed the latest GB/T 77i3.i--2006＇Presentation of theses and dissertations＇ and GB/T 77i3.3--zoo9 GB/T 77i3.3-- zoo9 ＇Presentation of scientific and technical report, which are components of GB/T 77i3--i987 ＇Presentation of scientific and technical reports, dissertations and scientific papers By comparing the two presentations with the GB/T 3 102.11- i993 ＇Mathematical signs and symbols for use in the physical sciences and technology＇ and GB/T 77i3--i987, the advantage and improvement about the latest ones were pointed out. For the existing issue of using multiple standards in the sci-tech journals, some suggestions were proposed, and signs that can not be line-shifted are also listed, expecting providing references for the modifying work of GB/T 77i 3.＇Presentation of scientific papers：
出处
《中国科技信息》
2013年第22期204-206,共3页
China Science and Technology Information
关键词
国家标准
数学公式
公式转行
national standard
mathematical formula
line-shifting
