2Glittenberg D,Hemmes J L,Bergh N O. Cationnic Starches in System with High Levels of Anionic Trash. Paper Technology, 1994,35(9):18
3Bley L. Measuering the concentration of anionic trash-the PCD. Paper Technology, 1992,33(4):32
4Fogarty T J. Cost-effective Common Sense Approach to Stickies Control. Tappi J, 1993,76(3):161
5Ling T F,Sutman F J,Richmann S K,et al. Effect of Pulping Conditions on Stickies Behavior in Office Waste Deinking System,Tappi J,1994,77(7):143
6Gassmann H. New Ways of Finely Screening Waste Paper. Paper Technology, 1998,39(11):57
7Pimley J J, Ress B. Replacing Dispersion with Screening for the Elimination of Stickies. Appita J,1998,51(5):338
8Gooding R W,Craig D F. The effect of slot spacing on pulp screen capacity. Tappi J,1992,75(2):71
9Fursey M. Thick or thin?Selection and Application of Fine Screening Equipment for Contaminant and Stickies Removal. Tappi Pulping Conference, 1999:433
10Wise E M, Arnold J M. The Role of Specific Gravity for Removal of Hot Melt Adhesives in Recyclable Grades. Tappi J,1992,75(9):181