期刊文献+

肝移植术后急性肾损伤的危险因素分析 被引量:7

Risk factors of acute kidney injury after liver transplantation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨影响肝移植术后急性肾损伤(AKI)的危险因素。方法回顾性研究2007年1月至2013年8月在中山大学附属第三医院肝移植中心行肝移植的300例患者临床资料。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。根据患者术后有否发生AKI分为AKI组和非AKI组。AKI组93例,其中男83例,女10例;年龄24~72岁,中位年龄48岁;非AKI组207例,其中男183例,女24例;年龄20~75岁,中位年龄48岁。观察两组患者住院期间病死率及AKI组不同分期患者的病死率。比较两组患者术前血清白蛋白(ALB)、血清肌酐(Scr)、肾小球滤过率(GFR)、终末期肝病模型联合血清钠(MELD-Na)评分、术中出血量、输血量、冷缺血时间、无肝期时间、手术时间,以及术后有否发生脓毒症等临床参数的差异,并进一步比较AKI组中不同分期患者临床参数的差异。正态分布资料比较采用t检验和单因素方差分析;非正态分布资料比较采用秩和检验;率的比较采用χ2检验。结果AKI组患者的住院期间病死率为12%(11/93),非AKI组为5%(10/207),差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.826,P<0.05)。AKI组患者肾损伤危险期、肾损伤期、急性肾衰竭期的病死率分别为3%(1/39)、15%(5/33)、33%(7/21),病死率呈逐渐上升趋势(χ2=10.806,P<0.05)。AKI的发生与术前ALB、Scr、GFR、MELD-Na评分,术中出血量、输血量有关(t=-11.7,t=7.88,t=-4.37,Z=7.1,Z=10.0,t=3.89;P<0.05)。AKI组术后脓毒症发生率为22%(20/93),非AKI组为13%(27/207),差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.157,P<0.05)。AKI组患者急性肾衰竭的发生与术前Scr、GFR、MELD-Na评分和术中出血、输血量有关(F=18.31,F=7.03,H=22.49,H=6.58,H=8.68;P<0.05)。结论肝移植术后AKI患者的病死率高,其发生与术前ALB、肾功能、MELD-Na评分和术中出血量、输血量有关,应加强围手术期监测,预防AKI的发生。 Objective To explore the risk factors of acute kidney injury (AKI) after liver transplantation (LT). Methods Clinical data of 300 patients who underwent LT from January 2007 to August 2013 in Liver Transplantation Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all participating subjects were obtained and the local ethical committee approval had been received. According to whether the patients developed AKI after operation, the patients were divided into AKI group (n=93, 83 males and 10 females, age: 24-72 years old, median age of 48 years old) and non-AKI group (n=207, 183 males and 24 females, age: 20-75 years old, median age of 48 years old). The hospital mortality of two groups and mortality of patients with different stages in AKI group were observed. The differences of clinical parameters such as preoperative serum albumin (ALB), serum creatinine (Scr), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), model for end-stage liver disease with serum sodium (MELD-Na) score, intraoperative blood loss and transfusion, cold ischemia time, anhepatic period, duration of operation and development of sepsis after operation of two groups were compared. And the differences of clinical parameters of patients with different stages in AKI group were further compared. The comparison of normal distribution data was performed using t test and one-way analysis of variance. The comparison of non-normal distribution data was performed using rank sum test. The comparison of ratio was performed using Chi-square test. Results The hospital mortality was 12% (11/93) in AKI group, and was 5% (10/207) in non-AKI group, where significant difference was observed (χ2=4.826, P〈0.05). The mortality of patients in AKI group in risk stage, injury stage, failure stage were 3% (1/39), 15% (5/33), 33% (7/21) respectively with a gradual upward trend (χ2=10.806,P〈0.05). The development of AKI was related with preoperative ALB, Scr, GFR, MELD-Na score, intraoperative blood loss and transfusion (t=-11.7, t=7.88, t=-4.37, Z=7.1, Z=10.0, t=3.89; P〈0.05). The incidence of postoperative sepsis was 22% (20/93) in AKI group, and was 13% (27/207) in non-AKI group, where significant difference was observed (χ2=4.157, P〈0.05). The development of acute kidney failure in AKI group was related with preoperative Scr, GFR, MELD-Na score, intraoperative blood loss and transfusion (F=18.31, F=7.03, H=22.49, H=6.58, H=8.68; P〈0.05). Conclusions The mortality of patients with AKI after LT is high. The development of AKI after LT is related with preoperative ALB, renal function, MELD-Na score, intraoperative blood loss and transfusion. Perioperative monitoring should be enhanced to prevent AKI.
出处 《中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志》 CAS 2013年第5期34-37,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition)
基金 "十二五"科技重大专项(2012ZX10002017-005 2012ZX10002-016) 国家自然科学基金(U0932006 81172036)
关键词 肝移植 急性肾损伤 肾机能不全 危险因素 肌酸酐 Liver transplantation Acute kidney injury Renal insufficiency Risk factors Creatinine
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Coca SG, Yusuf B, Shlipak MG, et al. Long-term risk of mortality and other adverse outcomes after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis, 2009, 53(6): 961-973.
  • 2Guitard J, Cointault O, Kamar N, et al. Acute renal failurefollowing liver transplantation with induction therapy. Clin Nephrol, 2006, 65(2): 103-112.
  • 3肝移植受者肾功能损伤诊疗指南[J].中华移植杂志(电子版),2011,5(3):60-62. 被引量:6
  • 4Biagioni E, Cavazzuti I, Busani S, et al. Acute renal failure and renal replacement therapy in the postoperative period of orthotopic liver transplant patients versus nonelective abdominal surgery patients. Transplant Proc, 2011, 43(4): 1145-1147.
  • 5Rimola A, Gavaler JS, Schade RR, et al. Effects of renal impairment on liver transplantation. Gastroenterology, 1987, 93(1): 148-156.
  • 6Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, et al. Acute renal failure: definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs, the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care, 2004, 8(4): R204-R212.
  • 7Kim WR, Biggins SW, Kremers WK, et al. Hyponatremia and mortality among patients on the liver-transplant waiting list. N Engl J Med, 2008, 359(10): 1018-1026.
  • 8Chuang FR, Lin CC, Wang PH, et al. Acute renal failure after cadaveric related liver transplantation. Transplant Proc, 2004, 36(8): 2328-2330.
  • 9Gainza FJ, Valdivieso A, Quintanilla N, et al. Evaluation of acute renal failure in the liver transplantation perioperative period: incidence and impact. Transplant Proc, 2002, 34(1): 250-251.
  • 10Narciso RC, Ferraz LR, Mies S, et al. Impact of acute kidney injury exposure period among liver transplantation patients. BMC Nephrol, 2013, 14: 43.

二级参考文献36

  • 1叶任高,陆在英.内科学.第6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:95-96.
  • 2[1]Navarro F,Le Moino MC,Fabre JM,et al.Specific vascular complications of orthotopic liver transplantation with preservation of the retrohepatic vena cava:review of 1361 cases.Transplantation,1999,68(5):646
  • 3[2]Parrilla P,Sanchez-Bueno F,Figueras J,et al.Analysis of the complications of the piggy-back technique in 1112 liver transplants.Tranplantation,1999,67(9):1214
  • 4[3]Wu YM,Voigt M,Rayhill S,et al.Suprahepatic venacavaplasty(cavaplasty) with retrohepatic cava extension in liver transplantation:experience with first 115 cases.Transplantation,2001,72(8):1389
  • 5吴在德 吴肇汉.外科学第6版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005.428.
  • 6Merion RM. Current status and future of liver transplantation. Semin Liver Dis,2010,30(4) :411-421.
  • 7Bryce CL, Chang CC, Angus DC, et al. The Effect of Race, Sex, and Insurance Status on Time-to-Listing Decisions for Liver Trans- plantation[ J/OL]. J Transplant, 2010 [ 2011-06-17 ]. http:// www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pme/articles/PMC3014672/.
  • 8孙振球,徐勇勇.医学统计学.第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.
  • 9Sotil EU, Gottstein J, Ayala E, et al. hnpact of preoperative overt hepatic encephalopathy on neurocognitive function after liver trans- plantation. Liver Transp1,2009,15 (2) : 184-192.
  • 10Poison J, Lee WM. AASLD position paper: the management of acute liver failure. Hepatology ,2005,41 ( 5 ) : 1179-1197.

共引文献81

同被引文献34

引证文献7

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部