期刊文献+

自尊在社会支持与专业决策自我效能间的中介作用 被引量:1

Self-esteem Acts The Mediation Role Between Students Social Support And The Career Decision-making Self-efficacy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了解高中生专业决策自我效能的总体状况,以及专业决策自我效能与高中生自尊、社会支持状况之间的关系,研究者选取了山东省两城市的600名高中生进行了调查研究。结果发现:(1)高中生专业决策自我效能处于中等稍偏上的水平;(2)高中生专业决策自我效能在性别、城乡、年级以及是否为独生子方面存在差异;(3)相关分析表明,高中生自尊、社会支持和专业决策自我效能之间,存在两两显著正相关;(4)中介效应检验结果表明,自尊在社会支持与高中生专业决策自我效能之间起着部分中介作用。 To understand the overall status of high school students career decision-making self-efficacy and the relationship among the high school students career decision-making self-efficacy, the self-esteem, social support condition, the researchers has carried on the investigation and study, selecting 600 high school students in two cities of Shandong province as subjects. The results show that :(1)high school students career decision-making self-efficacy is in medium level on the slightly ;(2)there is no significant difference on gender, urban or rural areas, and whether the only; Different grade, the parents of different cultural levels of high school students, there are significant differences ;(3)the correlation analysis showed that there are significant positive correlation between their self-esteem, social support and the career decis- ion-making self-efficacy;(4)the intermediary effect test results show that the self-esteem plays a partial me- diation effect between the social support and career decision-making self-efficacy.
出处 《潍坊工程职业学院学报》 2013年第6期69-73,共5页 Journal of Weifang Engineering Vocational College
关键词 专业决策 自我效能 高中生 自尊 社会支持 career decision-making self-efficacy high school student self-esteem social support corre-lation the mediation effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献30

  • 1汪向东 王希林 等.心理卫生评定量表手册增订版[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.134-142,161-167.
  • 2[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 3[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 4[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 5[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 6[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 7[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 8[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312
  • 9[10]Sobel M E. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In: J S Long (Ed.) Common problems/proper solutions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988. 46~64
  • 10[11]Clogg C C, Petkova E, Shihadeh E S. Statistical methods for analyzing collapsibility in regression models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1992, 17(1): 51~74

共引文献7755

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部