论国家安全审查措施在WTO中的可诉性

On National Security Review Litigable in WTO

随着"走出去"战略的不断深入,中国企业走出去的步伐越来越频繁和大胆,世界各国都遍布中国企业的足迹。一方面,各国为了吸引外资的需要都欢迎中国企业到其本国投资,另一方面,中国企业,尤其是国有企业给东道国带来一定的压力,各国从某种程度上开始抵制中国企业的大幅度投资。国家安全审查是这种抵制的最强有力的手段,基本上被市场开放程度较高的发达经济体普遍采用。从三一重工诉美国CIFUS案入手,对国家安全审查的国内司法可诉性和国际法可诉性进行对比,试图寻找出国家安全审查这一政府行政行为是否属于WTO的管辖权?中国企业和政府如何通过WTO这一途径高效地维护企业在海外的利益。

Chinese enterprises have been more and more active in the global market. The ＂ go global＂ strategy gives Chinese enterprises chances to invest in other countries, including developing countries and developed countries. On one hand, the host countries are interesting in Chinese money, on the other hand, they are also under pressure that Chinese enterprises, especially SOEs will threat the national security. The national security review measure is one of the powerful governmental measures to regulate Chinese enterprises＇oversea investments. The article starts from the Ralls v. CFIUS case in the US and tries to find out whether the national security review measure under the jurisdiction of WTO.