期刊文献+

行政立法评估之成本收益分析——美国经验与中国实践 被引量:31

Cost-benefit Analysis on Assessment of Administrative Legislation: Eeperience in US and Practice in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国政府需要一种有效的行政立法的评估机制。理想的评估机制应当采取一种既考虑法规对经济发展的影响也考虑其对环境、公共健康的影响的多维度的评估方法。美国等国家采用的成本收益分析方法就是这样一种综合全面的立法评估工具。成本收益分析是用拟议中的法规的总收益减去总成本以考察法规的净收益的法规评估方法。美国的经验显示现有的对成本收益分析的批评大多得到了有效的反驳。成本收益分析相对于可行性分析、绝对性分析和整体利益衡量的法规评估方法具有明显优势。在我国,成本收益分析有助于在行政立法中科学考量环境和公共健康等因素。采用从程序性成本收益分析逐步过渡到软性成本收益分析的评估方法可以帮助我国政府有效提高行政立法的质量。 Our government needs an efficient assessment mechanism on administrative legislation. An ideal assessment mechanism should employ a multidimensional method which takes into consideration rules' impacts on economic development as well as environment and public health. Cost-benefit analysis applied by many countries such as US, is such a comprehensive tool for assessment of legislation. It tests the net benefits of a proposed rule by subtracting the rule' s total costs from its total benefits. The experiences of US suggest that there are strong and effective objections to present major refutations of cost-benefit analysis. Compared with feasibility ap- proach, absolutist approach and intuitive balancing approach, cost-benefit analysis has obvious ad- vantages. If cost-benefit analysis is applied in administrative legislation assessment in China, en- vironment, public health and other factors will be considered scientifically. It will help the govern- ment to improve the quality of administrative legislation efficiently to apply the cost-benefit analy- sis in the way from a procedural rule to a soft rule gradually
作者 赵雷
出处 《环球法律评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期132-145,共14页 Global Law Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献82

  • 1GOV'T OF CAN. , CABINET DIRECTIVE ON STREAMLINING REGULATION 8 -9 (2007), http ://www. regula- tion. gc. ca/directive/directive-eng, pdf.
  • 2The United Kingdom' s Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform' s guidance document for regulatory analysts emphasizes BCA. See Impact Assessment Guidance paras. 26 -34, http ://www. berr. gov. uk/files/file44544, pdf.
  • 3Memorandum, European Comm' n, Working to Ensure Better Quality of Commission Impact Assessments, MEMO/06/427 (Nov. 14, 2006), available at http://ec, europa, eu/enterprise/ad- min-burdens-reduction/news_en, htm#aa ( announcing the creation of the Impact Assessment Board, a centralized unit dedi- cated to the review of impact assessments).
  • 4Secretariat, Pub. Governance & Territorial Directorate, OECD, Regula. tory Impact Analysis ( RIA ) Inventory, OECD Doc. GOV/PGC/RD ( 2004 ) 1 ( Apr. 15,2004 ), http://www. oecd. org/ dataoecd/22/9/35258430, pdf,last visited: October 12,2013.
  • 5Robert Frank & Cass Sunstein, "Cost-Benefit Analysis and Relative Position", 68 U. Chi. L. Rev. 323,326 -327 (2001).
  • 6Richard A. Posner, "Cost-Benefit Analysis: Definition, Justification, and Comment on Conference Papers", 29 J. LE- GAL STUD. 1153,1154 ( 2000 ).
  • 7Raymond J. Kopp, Alan J. Krupnick, and Michael Toman, "Cost-benefit analysis and regulatory reform: An assessment of the science and the art", Discussion Paper 97 - 119. Washington, DC : Resources for the Future. (1997).
  • 8Alan L. Porter, Frederick A. Rossini , Stanley R. Carpenter, A guidebook for technology assessment and impact analysis ( New York : North Holland. 1980) , p. 254.
  • 9Exee. OrderNo. 12,866, 58 Fed. Reg. 51,735-36, (Sept. 30, 1993).
  • 10Cass R Sunstein, The Cost-Benefit State, p. 20.

二级参考文献32

  • 1张千帆.“公共利益”的构成——对行政法的目标以及“平衡”的意义之探讨[J].比较法研究,2005,19(5):1-14. 被引量:120
  • 2黄昭元.《宪法权利限制的司法审查标准-美国类型化多元标准模式的比较分析》[J].台大法学论丛,.
  • 3理查德·A·波斯纳(Richard A.Posner),蒋红珍(译).行政法的潮涨潮落[J].比较法研究,2007,21(4):149-155. 被引量:9
  • 4《中华人民共和国行政许可法》第20、21条.
  • 5O See, Richard A. Posner, TheRise and Fall of Administrative Law, 72 Chi. --Kent L. Rev. 953 (1997).
  • 6See generally Symposium, Law and Incommensurability, 146 U. Pa. L. Rev 1169 (1998).
  • 7Jeremy Kirk, Constitutional Guarantees, Characterisation and the Concept of Proportionality, 21 Melb. U. L. Rev. 1. 8 (1997).
  • 8罗伯特.W.哈恩著、骆梅英译.《政府的规制成本收益分析》,载吴敬琏、江平主编.《洪范评论》第2卷第2辑,中国政法大学出版社,2005年.
  • 9Shelley Lynne Tomkin, Inside OMB : Politics and Process in the President ' s Budget Office, American Political Institutions and Public Policy, 1998, p. 6.
  • 10黄铭辉.《成本效益分析在我国行政法上应用可能性之研究》,台北大学法学学系硕士论文,2000年6月,第82页.

共引文献14

同被引文献432

引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部