中国大五人格问卷-简版在护士群体应用中的信效度

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory( CBF- PI) among Nurses

目的 检验中国大五人格问卷-简版（CBF-PI-B）在护士群体应用中的信效度.方法 采用CBF-PI-B对长沙市医疗机构356名护理人员进行调查.结果 ①量表所有条目的CR值为22.50 ～39.10（P＜0.01）；②量表具有很好的信度系数,内部一致性系数在0.716（宜人性）～0.773（神经质）之间,平均0.745；间隔8周的重测系数在0.722（严谨性）～0.777（外倾性）之间,平均0.748;建构信度在0.772（开放性）～0.821（严谨性）之间,平均0.796;③效度方面,模型拟合指标x2/df=2.728,GFI=0.878,GFI=0.849,CFI=0.853,IFI=0.844,TLI=0.802,RMSEA=0.064；量表5个维度间的相关系数为0.055～0.568,各维度内所有条目平均相关系数为0.596 ～ 0.624；神经质维度与DASS-C21总分及各分量表得分呈中等以上水平的显著正相关（r＞0.4,P＜0.01）,严谨性和外倾性维度与DASS-C21总分及各分量表得分呈显著负相关（P＜0.01）.结论 CBF-PI-B应用于护士群体有很好的信效度.

Objective To examine the reliability and validity of the CBF - PI in Chinese nurses population. Methods A total of 356 nurses in the medical institutions of Changsha were investigated with the CBF - PI. Results （1）The CR of items ranged from 22.50 39.10（P 〈0.01 ）. 2）Internal consistency reliabihties of the CBF - PI - B ranged from 0.716（A） to 0.773 （N） ,the mean was 0.745. The retest reliabilities after 8 weeks ranging from 0. 722 （ C ） to 0. 777 （ E）, the mean was 0. 748. The construct reliabilities ranged from 0. 772 （O） to 0.821 （C） , the mean was 0. 796. （3）The fit indexes of confirmatory factor analysis were X2/df = 2. 728, GFI = 0. 878, GFI = 0. 849, CFI -- 0. 853, IFI = 0. 844, TLI = 0. 802, RMSEA = 0. 064. The correlation coefficient among factors ranging from 0.055 - 0. 568, and the average correlation coefficient among items of every factor ranging from 0. 596 - 0.624. The C and N strongly correlated with the DASS - C21. Conclusion The CBF - PI is reliable and valid for application in nurses population.