期刊文献+

中文版独处问卷在大学生中的信效度检验 被引量:1

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Solitude Questionnaire in College Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的检验独处问卷在大学生群体应用的信度和效度。方法通过翻译、回译形成独处问卷中文版。方便选取935名大学生进行施测。对量表进行探索性因素分析(n=322)和验证性因素分析及多组比较分析(n=613)。结果探索性因素分析显示中文版独处问卷包括3个因子:积极独处、消极独处和中性独处。验证性因素分析发现3因子模型的拟舍指数为x。/df=3.70.NFI=0.92.NNFI=0.90,CFI=0.94.GFI=0.97,AGFI=0.94,RMSEA=0.07;男女多组比较验证性分析显示,3因子模型男女大学生群体上模型的因子负荷等同。积极独处和中性独处与独处偏好存在显著正相关(r=0.26,0.29;P〈0.001),3个因子与孤独感存在显著正相关(r=0.12—0.22,Ps〈0.05),积极独处因子和中性独处因子与情绪创造力存在显著正相关(r=0.21,P〈0.001;r=0.13,P〈0.05),消极独处因子与抑郁存在显著正相关(r=0.23,P〈0.001),中性独处因子与社交焦虑存在显著正相关(r’=0.17,P〈0.01)。量表3个因子的内部一致性信度Cronbaeh仅系数分别为0.81,O.67和0.56,2周后重测信度分别为0.80,0.80和0.75。结论独处问卷中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可以用于评定大学生独处体验。 Objective To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of solitude questionnaire in college students. Methods The Chinese version of Solitude Questionnaire was translated from the original English edition and administered to 935 college students. Exploratory factor analysis( EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)and multiple group analysis were conducted with two sam- ples(n~ = 322, n2 = 613). Results Exploratory factor analysis revealed that the Chinese version of solitude questionnaire was construc- ted by three factors : Positive solitude experience, negative solitude experience and neutral solitude experience. The confirmatory factor,a- nalysis confirmed the three-factor model and the fitting indices were x2/df = 3.70, NFI = 0.92, NNFI = 0.90, CFI = 0.94, GFI = O. 97, AGFI = O. 94, RMSEA = 0.07 ; Multiple group analysis supported the three-factor structure was compatible with the male and female data. Positive and neutral solitude were correlated with PSS( r = 0. 26,0. 29 ;P 〈 0. 001 ). All of the three factors correlated with UCLA( r = 0. 12 ~ 0. 22, Ps 〈 0.05 ), Positive and neutral solitude correlated with E CI (r = 0. 21, P 〈 0. 001 ;r = O. 13, P 〈 0.05 ). Only negative soli- tude correlated with SDS ( r = 0. 23, P 〈 0. 001 ) and only neutral solitude correlated with IAS ( r = 0. 17, P 〈 O. O1 ). The Cronbach ~x coef- ficients of three factors were 0.81,0.67 and 0.56. The test-retest reliability were 0.80,0.8 and 0.75. Conclusion The Chinese version of solitude questionnaire(SQ) shows adequate reliability and validity, and can be used in Chinese college students.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2013年第12期1819-1822,共4页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 大学生 独处问卷 信度 效度 心理测量学 College students Solitude questionnaire Reliability Validity Psychometric
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Hawkley L C, Cacioppo J T. Loneliness matters:A theoretical and em- pirical review of consequences and mechanisms[ J]. Annals of Behavo- rial Medicine,2010,dO(2) :218-227.
  • 2Masi C M, Chen, H Y, Hawkley, L. C. , et al. A meta - analysis of in- terventions to reduce loneliness[ J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review ,2011,15 ( 3 ) :219-266.
  • 3陈晓,周晖.自古圣贤皆“寂寞”?——独处及相关研究[J].心理科学进展,2012,20(11):1850-1859. 被引量:22
  • 4Long C R,Averill J R. Solitude:An exploration of benefits of being a- lone [ J ]. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 2003,33 ( 1 ) : 21- 44.
  • 5Larson R W, Lee M. The capacity to be alone as a stress buffer [ J ]. Journal of Social Psychology, 1996,136 ( 1 ) :5-16.
  • 6Larson R W The solitary side of life : An examination of the time people spend alone from children to old age[ J]. Development Review, 1990, 10(2) :155-183.
  • 7Larson R W. The emergence of solitude as a constructive domain of ex- perience in early adolescence [ J]. Child Development, 1997,68 (1) : 80-93.
  • 8吴丽娟,陈淑芬.国中生独处能力、主观生活压力和身心健康之相关研究[J].国立台湾师范大学教育心理学报,2006,38(2):85-104.
  • 9林淑惠.台湾中部地区大学生独处能力、生活压力与身心健康之相关研究.新竹教育大学教育学报,2009,(1).
  • 10黄韫臻,林淑惠.大学生独处方式、独处能力及其身心健康之分析[J].屏东教育大学学报,2009,33:11-126.

二级参考文献72

  • 1聂衍刚,蔡笑岳,张卫.初一学生人格特征、学习适应性与学习成绩关系的研究[J].心理与行为研究,2005,3(2):134-138. 被引量:25
  • 2李同归,加藤和生.成人依恋的测量:亲密关系经历量表(ECR)中文版[J].心理学报,2006,38(3):399-406. 被引量:466
  • 3李琼,郭永玉.作为人格变量的独处及其相关研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(1):96-98. 被引量:15
  • 4[6]戴海崎,张锋.心理教育测量[M].广州:暨南大学出版社,2003.
  • 5林淑惠.台湾中部地区大学生独处能力、生活压力与身心健康之相关研究.新竹教育大学教育学报,2009,(1).
  • 6Larson RW. The solitary side of life: An examination of the time people spend alone from childhood to old age. Developmental Review, 1990, 10(2): 155-183.
  • 7Burger JM. Individual differences in preference for solitude. Journal of Research in Personality, 1995, 29(1): 85-108.
  • 8Buchholz ES, Chinlund C. En route to harmony of being: Viewing aloneness as a need in development and child analytic work. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 1994, 11(3): 354- 374.
  • 9Long CR, Averill JR. Solitude: An exploration of benefits of being alone. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 2003, 33(1): 21-44.
  • 10Winnicott DW. The capacity to be alone. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1958, 39(2): 416--420.

共引文献2947

同被引文献15

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部