期刊文献+

大学生主观职业障碍与人格特征 被引量:6

The Relationship between College Students' Perceived Career Barriers and Personality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解大学生主观职业障碍与人格特征的关系,探索影响大学生主观职业障碍的人格因素。方法采用大学生主观职业障碍职前问卷和大五人格简式量表对北京某大学165名大学生进行测试。结果总体上,男生和女生的主观职业障碍总分不存在显著差异(t=1.26,P>0.05);农村学生的主观职业障碍总分显著高于城市学生的主观职业障碍总分(t=3.17,P<0.01);大学生主观职业障碍与宜人性(r=0.215,P<0.01)、神经质(r=0.387,P<0.01)有非常显著的正相关;神经质变量对主观职业障碍具有显著的正向预测作用(R2=0.15,P<0.01)。结论主观职业障碍不存在性别差异;农村学生的主观职业障碍显著高于城市学生;人格中的神经质因子对大学生主观职业障碍有正向预测作用,高神经质个体面对求职会感受到更多的障碍和心理压力,体验到更多的消极情绪。 Objective To make understanding of the relationship between college students'perceived career barriers and personality, and explore the personality factors that influence college students" perceived career barriers. Methods A total of 165 college students completed Perceived Career Barriers Inventory for Chinese undergraduates and Five - Factor Inventory. Results As a whole, there was no significant difference in perceived career barriers score between different gender college students ( t = I. 26,P 〉 0.05 ) ; Rural students and urban students had significant difference ( t = 3. 17, P 〈 O. 01 ) ; Students'perceived career barriers was positively related to amenity ( r = O. 215, P 〈 0. O1 )and neurotieism (r = 0. 387, P 〈 0. O1 ). Neuroticism could positively predict perceived career barriers ( R2 = O. 15, P 〈 O. O1 ). Condusion There is no significant gender difference in perceived career barriers; Rural college students have higher per- ceived more obstacles than urban students;Neuroticism earl positively predict their perceived career barriers. College students with high neuroticism will feel more barriers and psychological pressure when they obtain employment, and experience more negative emotions.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2013年第12期1902-1903,共2页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 精神卫生 大学生 主观职业障碍 人格特征 Mental hygiene College students Perceived career barriers Personality /
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1Costa PT, MeCrae RR. The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources,1985.
  • 2Costa PT, McCrae RR. The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI Manual suppiement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1989.
  • 3Costa PT, McCrae RR. NEO-PI-R professional manual. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PIR) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992.
  • 4Holden RR, Fekken GC. The NEO five factor inventory in a Canadian context: Psychometric properties for a sample of university women. Personality and Individual Differences, 1994, 17:441-444.
  • 5Egan V, Deary I, Austin E. The NEO-FFI: Emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggest N, A and Care more rehable than O and E. Personality and Individual Differences, 2000, 29:907-920.
  • 6Schmitz N, Hartkamp N, Baldini C, Rollnik J, Tress W. Psychometric properties of the German version of the NEO- FFI in psychosomatic outpatients. Personality and Individual Differences, 2001, 31:713-722.
  • 7Hrebickova M, Urbanek T, Cermak I, Szarota P, Fickova E, et al. The NEO five-factor inventory in Czech, Polish, and Slovak contexts. In McCrae RR Allik R. The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002:53-78.
  • 8McCrae RR, Costa PT. A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 2004, 36:587-596.
  • 9Costa PT, McCrae RR. The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI Manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1989.
  • 10Parker WD, Stumpf H. A validation of the five-factor model of personality in academically talented youth across observers and instruments. Personality and Individual Differences, 1998, 25:1005-1025.

共引文献175

同被引文献34

  • 1刘靖炜,刘爱书.大学生竞争态度与大五人格关系的研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2008,16(4):382-385. 被引量:22
  • 2侯志瑾,梁湘明.Gottfredson的职业抱负发展理论简介与研究评述[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(2):201-210. 被引量:33
  • 3金盛华,李雪.大学生职业价值观:手段与目的[J].心理学报,2005,37(5):650-657. 被引量:230
  • 4范慧玲,施国春.择业效能感对大学生职业探索行为的影响研究[J].中国大学生就业,2006(15):101-102. 被引量:8
  • 5Swanson JL, Tokar DM. College students'perceptions of barriers to ca- reer development[ J]. J Vocat Behav, 1991,38 ( 1 ) :92 - 106.
  • 6Doren B, Lombardi AR, Clark J, et al. Addressing career barriers for high risk adolescent girls : The PATHS curriculum intervention [ J ]. J Adol,2013,36(6) :1083 - 1092.
  • 7Albert KA, Luzzo DA. The role of perceived barriers in career develop- ment:A social cognitive perspective[ J]. J Couns Dev, 1999,77 (4) : 431 - 436.
  • 8[美]理查德.格里格,菲利普.津巴多.心理学与生活(第16版)[M].王垒,等,译.北京:人民邮电出版社,2003:386.
  • 9MCCRAE, R. R. & COSTA, P. T ,JR. The Structure of Inter- personal traits: Wiggins Circumflex and the Five- factor Model[J]. Jour- hal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989(56) :586 - 595.
  • 10PATRCK J. ROTYINGHAUS,SUSAN X,et al. The Career Futures Inventory: A Measure of Career - Related Adapta- bility and Optimism [ J ]. Journal of Career Assessment, February 2005,13( 1 ) :3 - 24.

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部