期刊文献+

潜心八股举业:清代士绅阶层小说戏曲禁毁舆论的功利诉求 被引量:1

Devotion to Eight-part Essay Examination:the Utilitarian Requirements of the Public Opinions on Novels and Traditional Operas Among the Gentry in Qing Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 与官方禁毁小说戏曲的法令不同,明清士绅阶层的禁毁舆论除了维护理学道统的目的,还与八股举业有着密切的联系。士绅为了让子弟潜心举业、苦练八股而呼吁禁毁小说戏曲,这种功利诉求直接影响官方政策,带动国家机器参与其中,与官方禁毁法令互为补充,在中国小说戏曲禁毁史上值得关注。 Differing from the official laws and decrees which banned and damaged novels and traditional operas, the gentry in Qing dynasty supported public opinion of forbidding and damaging them. Besides aiming to maintain the Neo-Confucian orthodoxy, the above public opinion also had close relations with eight-part essay examinations. In order to make sons and younger brothers devote themselves to the examinations and practise hard their eight-part essay writing, the gentry appealed for forbidding and damaging novels and traditional operas. This utilitarian requirement directly affected the official policy, spurred the government to participate in it, which was the complements of the official laws and decrees, so it deserves concern and attention in the Chinese history of forbidding and damaging novels and traditional operas.
作者 胡海义
出处 《中国文学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期51-54,共4页 Research of Chinese Literature
基金 国家社科基金项目"八股文与明清小说相互关系研究"(12CZW034)的阶段性成果
关键词 八股文 小说戏曲 科举 禁毁 士绅舆论 Eight-part Essays novels and traditional operas imperial civil examinations forbidding and damaging gentry opin- ions
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献60

  • 1欧阳健.古代小说禁书漫话[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,2001.
  • 2都穆.都公谈纂[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
  • 3李昌祺.运甓漫稿[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005.
  • 4李时勉.古廉文集[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005.
  • 5李时勉.至正妓人行践[A].剪灯新话外二种[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1981.
  • 6胡广等.明太祖实录[M].台北:台湾中央研究院历史语言研究所,1962.
  • 7黄佐.南雍志[M].续修四库全书:第749册[z].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
  • 8王圻.续文献通考[M].续修四库全书:第762册[z].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
  • 9吴宣德.中国教育制度通史(明代卷)[M].济南:山东教育出版社,2000.
  • 10俞汝楫等.礼部志稿[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005.

共引文献11

同被引文献26

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部