摘要
目的评价3种治疗模式对中晚期食管癌的临床疗效和毒性反应。方法对解放军264医院2011年3月—2013年3月收治的采用3种治疗模式[同步放化疗组(n=36)、序贯放化疗组(n=43)、单纯放疗组(n=39)]治疗的中晚期食管癌118例的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果①近期疗效:近期有效率同步放化疗组(91.7%)、序贯放化疗组(65.1%)显著高于单纯放疗组(46.2%)(P<0.05),同步放化疗组显著高于序贯放化疗组(P<0.05)。②远期疗效:3组1年生存率分别为83.3%、74.4%、69.2%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2年生存率同步放化疗组(50.0%)与序贯放化疗组(41.9%)显著高于单纯放疗组(20.5%)(P<0.05),前两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。③毒性反应:同步放化疗组、序贯放化疗组骨髓抑制、食管炎、放射性肺炎、恶心呕吐发生率均显著高于单纯放疗组(P<0.05),而同步放化疗组、序贯放化疗组上述毒性反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论同步放化疗治疗中晚期食管癌效果优于序贯放化疗及单纯放疗,虽不良反应增多,但多数患者可耐受。
Objective To evaluate the clinic efficiency and toxic reaction of three therapy methods in treatment of patients with esophageal cancer in middle-advanced stage. Methods Clinical data of 118 patients with esophageal cancer in middle-advanced stage, who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (group A, n = 36) , sequential chemora- diotherapy ( group B, n = 43) and radiotherapy ( group C, n = 39) , during March 2011 and March 2013 in our hospital was retrospectively analyzed. Results In terms of short-term curative effects, short-term effective rate of 91.7% in group A and 65.1% in group B were significantly higher than 46.2% in group C (P 〈0. 05) , and that in group A was significantly higher than that in group B ( P 〈 0.05 ). In terms of prostecdtive efficacy, one-year survival rates in the three groups were 83.3% , 74.4% and 69.2% respectively, and the differences were not statistically significant (P 〉 0.05 ) ; two-years of survival rate of 50.0% in group A and 41.9% in group B were significantly higher than 20.5% in group C ( P 〈 0.05), but the difference was not statistically significant ( P 〉 0.05). In toxic reaction, the incidence rates of my- elosuppression, esophagitis, radiation pneumonia, nausea and vomiting in group A and B were significantly higher than those in group C ( P 〈 0.05 ) , but there were no significant differences in the incidence rates between group A and B (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is more effective in treatment of patients with esophageal cancer in middle-advanced stage than those by sequential chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy. Although it has more toxic reac- tions, most patients can tolerate it.
出处
《解放军医药杂志》
CAS
2013年第11期59-61,共3页
Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal of Chinese People’s Liberation Army
基金
全军保健基金(13BJZ04)
关键词
食管肿瘤
肿瘤治疗方案
治疗结果
对比研究
Esophageal neoplasm
Antineoplastic protocol
Treatment outcome
Comparative study