期刊文献+

同步放化疗治疗中晚期食管癌效果分析 被引量:14

Effect of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Treatment of Patients with Esophageal Cancer in Middle-Advanced Stage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价3种治疗模式对中晚期食管癌的临床疗效和毒性反应。方法对解放军264医院2011年3月—2013年3月收治的采用3种治疗模式[同步放化疗组(n=36)、序贯放化疗组(n=43)、单纯放疗组(n=39)]治疗的中晚期食管癌118例的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果①近期疗效:近期有效率同步放化疗组(91.7%)、序贯放化疗组(65.1%)显著高于单纯放疗组(46.2%)(P<0.05),同步放化疗组显著高于序贯放化疗组(P<0.05)。②远期疗效:3组1年生存率分别为83.3%、74.4%、69.2%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2年生存率同步放化疗组(50.0%)与序贯放化疗组(41.9%)显著高于单纯放疗组(20.5%)(P<0.05),前两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。③毒性反应:同步放化疗组、序贯放化疗组骨髓抑制、食管炎、放射性肺炎、恶心呕吐发生率均显著高于单纯放疗组(P<0.05),而同步放化疗组、序贯放化疗组上述毒性反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论同步放化疗治疗中晚期食管癌效果优于序贯放化疗及单纯放疗,虽不良反应增多,但多数患者可耐受。 Objective To evaluate the clinic efficiency and toxic reaction of three therapy methods in treatment of patients with esophageal cancer in middle-advanced stage. Methods Clinical data of 118 patients with esophageal cancer in middle-advanced stage, who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (group A, n = 36) , sequential chemora- diotherapy ( group B, n = 43) and radiotherapy ( group C, n = 39) , during March 2011 and March 2013 in our hospital was retrospectively analyzed. Results In terms of short-term curative effects, short-term effective rate of 91.7% in group A and 65.1% in group B were significantly higher than 46.2% in group C (P 〈0. 05) , and that in group A was significantly higher than that in group B ( P 〈 0.05 ). In terms of prostecdtive efficacy, one-year survival rates in the three groups were 83.3% , 74.4% and 69.2% respectively, and the differences were not statistically significant (P 〉 0.05 ) ; two-years of survival rate of 50.0% in group A and 41.9% in group B were significantly higher than 20.5% in group C ( P 〈 0.05), but the difference was not statistically significant ( P 〉 0.05). In toxic reaction, the incidence rates of my- elosuppression, esophagitis, radiation pneumonia, nausea and vomiting in group A and B were significantly higher than those in group C ( P 〈 0.05 ) , but there were no significant differences in the incidence rates between group A and B (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is more effective in treatment of patients with esophageal cancer in middle-advanced stage than those by sequential chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy. Although it has more toxic reac- tions, most patients can tolerate it.
机构地区 解放军 解放军
出处 《解放军医药杂志》 CAS 2013年第11期59-61,共3页 Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal of Chinese People’s Liberation Army
基金 全军保健基金(13BJZ04)
关键词 食管肿瘤 肿瘤治疗方案 治疗结果 对比研究 Esophageal neoplasm Antineoplastic protocol Treatment outcome Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献37

  • 1王洪林,陶莉,王利,魏子祥.食管癌的立体适形放疗和同步化疗[J].实用肿瘤学杂志,2004,18(3):181-183. 被引量:3
  • 2吴剑,戴慧,翁欣然,林权冰,卢晓红.小剂量顺铂对中晚期食管癌放疗增敏作用的近期疗效观察[J].中国肿瘤临床,2006,33(13):768-770. 被引量:34
  • 3Brenner B, Ilson D H, Minsky B D. Treatment of localized esophageal cancer [J]. Semin Oncol, 2004,31 (4):554-565.
  • 4Ishida K,Ando N,Yamamoto S,et al. Phase Ⅱ study of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with concurrent radiotherapy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a Japan Esophageal Oncology Group (J EOG)/Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG9516)[J]. JapanJ ClinOncol,2004,34(10):615-619.
  • 5Kleinberg LR, Eapen S, Hamilton S, et al. E1201 : An Eastern Coop- erative ()neology Group(ECOG) Randomized phase I] trial to meas ure response rate and toxicity of preoperative combined modality pa- elitaxel/cisplatin/RT or irinotecan/cisplatin/RT in adenocar? cinoma of the esophagus~J3. Int J Rad OncoI Bio Phys,2006,66 (3 Suppl) : 80.
  • 6Roof KS, Coen J, Lynch TJ, et al. concurrent cisplalin, 5 Fu, pa- clitaxel,and radiation therapy in patients with locally adVanced esophageal cancer~J~. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006,65 (4) : 1120 1128.
  • 7Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouch6 O. Chemoradiation followed by sur- gery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus:FFCD 9102 EJ~. J Clin Qncol, 2007,25(10)= 1160 1168.
  • 8Mariette C,Piessenl G, Lamblin A. Impact of preoperative radio- chemotherapy on postoperative course and survival in patients with locally advanced squamous cell oesophageal carcinomaEJ~. Br J Surg,2006,93(9) :1077-1083.
  • 9Tepper J,Krasna MJ,Niedzwiecki D,et al. Phase [1I trial of tri modality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer= CALGB9781~J~. J Clin Oncol,2008,26(7)=1086 1092.
  • 10吕进 曹秀峰 朱斌 等 电子版.新辅助放化疗对食管癌手术和预后的影响[J/cD],中华临床医师杂志[J].2011,.

共引文献335

同被引文献153

引证文献14

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部