摘要
从"营造学社"伊始的中国的城市文化遗产保护,具有"后发外生"的基本特征,并形成了文化主导和制度主导的两种路径类型。两者在多个方面有不同的表现形式,是具有历时性关系、而无共时性价值的两种形态。但从实效的视角分析两者深层思想逻辑的差异后发现,文化主导路径的思想逻辑具有"内生性"、"前瞻性"的特征,其保护思路值得借鉴。
Urban cultural heritage protection in China which dates back to the ＂Building Society＂ has the basic characteristics of ＂Latecomer＂ and two modes： culture-led mode and system-led mode. Having different manifestations in many areas, the two modes are two forms with diachronic relationship and without synchronic value. However, after analyzing the differences in deep ideological logic between the two modes from the perspective of the actual effect, this paper finds that the ideology of the culture-led mode is ＂endogenous＂ and ＂forward- looking＂ and thus worth learning.
出处
《城市规划》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第11期39-46,共8页
City Planning Review
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(51278113)
江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划资助项目(CX09B_054Z)
关键词
城市文化遗产
发展特征
保护路径
urban cultural heritage
development characteristics
protection mode
