期刊文献+

应力双折射对偏振相移干涉检测的影响 被引量:3

Influence of Birefringence on Polarization Phase Shifting Interferometry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 偏振相移干涉中标准镜头及其他元件的应力双折射会产生检测误差.利用琼斯矩阵对偏振相移原理进行误差分析,发现应力双折射会引起CCD上产生8个相干光干涉,检测误差与CCD像面上的测试光和参考光的振幅之比、检测腔的相位、应力双折射的大小和方向等因素有关.检测误差在每1根干涉条纹中会出现2次周期性变化,误差的峰谷值最大可以达到应力双折射的4倍.当应力双折射的方向具有一致性时可以减小检测误差,当方向完全一致时,检测误差完全消除.通过对一个12英寸的材料进行分析发现,边缘处4英寸材料的应力双折射中心处为18nm,产生的检测误差峰谷值为72nm;边缘处材料的应力双折射为22nm,方向具有更好的一致性,产生的检测误差峰谷值为24.9nm. The birefringence of transmission flat/sphere and other components introduces measurement error in Polarization Phase Shifting Interferometry (PPSI). Based on the principle of PPSI, the measurement error was analyzed by using the Jonse maxtrix formulations. It was found that the birefringence generated eight beams interference on the CCD, and the measurement error was a function of the ratio of amplitude of test beam and reference beam, the testing cavity phase, the amount and orientation of birefringence. The measurement error varied 2 periods in every fringe. The maximal PV of measurement error would be 4 times of birefringence and the measurement error would be compressed if the orientation of birefringence was consistent. When the birefringence was of the same orientation, the measurement error could be eliminated. A ?12 inches material was analyzed. The results show that the birefringence of the Ф4 inches area in the center was 18 nm, which introduced the measurement error of 72 nm (PV). The birefringence of the material at the edge was 22 nm and the measurement error was 24.9 nm (PV) because of the consistence of birefringence orientation.
作者 宣斌
出处 《光子学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期1319-1323,共5页 Acta Photonica Sinica
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划(No.XXXXXXXX)项目 "XX"科技探索与验证条件建设项目专项计划资助
关键词 光学检测 干涉测量 应力双折射 光学仪器 光学工程 Optical testing Interferometry-measurements Birefringenee Optical instruments Optical engineering
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献57

共引文献86

同被引文献32

  • 1奚国栋,周华民,李德群.注塑工艺参数对制品残余应力和收缩的影响[J].化工学报,2007,58(1):248-254. 被引量:37
  • 2高月华,王希诚.注塑制品的翘曲优化及影响因素分析[J].化工学报,2007,58(6):1575-1580. 被引量:42
  • 3李霞,袁艳,赵建科.干涉仪的微应力安装力学分析以及试验结果[J].光子学报,2007,36(5):918-921. 被引量:8
  • 4SHARIHARAN P. Interferometric testing of optical surfaces: absolute measurements of flatness [J]. Optical Engineering 1997, 36(9) : 2478-2481.
  • 5GRECO V, TRONCONI R, VECCHIO C D, et al. Absolute measurement of planarity with Fritzs method: uncertainty evaluation[J]. Applied Optlcs, 1999, 38(10): 2018-2027.
  • 6RHEE H G. Self-calibration of high frequency errors of test optics by arbitrary N-step rotation[J]. International Journal of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering, 2000, 1(2) : 115-123.
  • 7EVANS C J, KESTNER R N. Test optics error removal[J]. Applied optics, 1996, 35(7) : 1015-1021.
  • 8ICHIKAWA H, YAMAMOTO T. Apparatus and method for wavefront absolute calibration and method of synthesizing wavefronts:US, 5982490[P]. 1999-10-09.
  • 9OTAKI K, YAMAMOTO T, Y FUKUDA, et al. Accuracy evaluation of the point diffraction interferometer for extreme ultraviolet lithography aspheric mirror[J]. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures, 2002, 20(1): 295-300.
  • 10SONG Wei-hong, WU Fan, HOU Xi. Method to test rotationally asymmetric surface deviation with high accuracy [J]. Applied Optics, 2012, 51(22): 5567-5572.

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部