期刊文献+

公共产品技术创新中公共部门技术获取机制比较研究 被引量:2

Comparative Study on Mechanisms of Technology Acquisition in Public Goods Technological Innovation
原文传递
导出
摘要 公共部门在公共产品技术创新中利用企业的技术研发能力来进行技术获取,可以提高公共产品技术创新的效率和水平,同时也可以带动企业技术创新能力的增强。通过对公共产品技术创新过程中,公共部门技术获取的研发竞赛机制和谈判机制进行比较研究,分析比较了两种机制下公共部门的收益,进而讨论了两种机制选择的边界条件,为公共部门在公共产品技术创新中技术获取机制的选择提供了理论基础。 The utilization of enterprises' technological innovation ability by public department in public goods tech-nological innovation can enhance efficiency and level of public goods technological innovation and also ability of enterprises technological innovation. This paper analyzes the contests mechanism and bargaining mechanism of tech-nology acquisition in public goods technological innovation, compares the expected revenue of public department under the two mechanisms and then discusses the scope of application of the two mechanisms which provides the-oretical basis for public departments' choice of mechanisms of technology acquisition in public goods technologi-cal innovation.
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第12期37-44,共8页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAH29F01)
关键词 公共产品技术创新 技术获取 研发竞赛机制 谈判机制 public goods technological innovation technology acquisition research contests bargaining
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1仲伟俊.公共产品创新问题研究[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,10(3):13-19. 被引量:25
  • 2Lalive R, Sehmutzler A. Auctions VS negotiations in public procurement: Which works better?[R]. Working Papers Series, 2011.
  • 3Fullerton R L, Linster B G, Meckeem, et al. Using auctions to reward tournament winners: Theory and ex- perimental investigations[J]. Rand Journal of Econom- ics, 2002,33(1):62-84.
  • 4Che Y K, Gale I. Optimal design of research con- tests[J]. The American Economic Review, 2003,93(3): 646-671.
  • 5Schottner A. Fixed-prize tournaments versus first-price auctions in innovation contests[J]. Economic Theory,2008,35(1):57-71.
  • 6Terwiesch C, Xu Y. Innovation contests, open innova- tion and multiagent problem solving[J]. Management Science, 2008,54(9):1529-1543.
  • 7Taylor C R. Digging for golden carrots: An analysis of research tournaments[J]. The American Economic Re- view, 1995,85(4):872-890.
  • 8Boudreau K J, Lacetera N, Lakhani K R. Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An em- pirical analysis[J]. Management Science, 2011,57(5): 843-863.
  • 9Nash J. The bargaining problem[J]. Econometrica, 1950, 18(1):155-162.
  • 10Rubinstein A. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining mod- el[J]. Econometrica, 1982,50(1):97-110.

二级参考文献32

  • 1田华,郑晓齐,田中.美国基础研究管理体系分析[J].科技管理研究,2006,26(3):23-26. 被引量:13
  • 2Admati, A.R. & Perry, M. (1987). Strategic delay in bargaining. Review of Economic Studies, 54:345-364.
  • 3Branco, F. (1997). The design of multidimensional auctions. RAND Journal of Economics, 28 (1): 63-81.
  • 4Bulow, J. & Klemperer, P. (1996). Auctions versus negotiations. The American Economic Review, 86:180-194.
  • 5Che, Y.K. (1993). Design competition through multidimensional auctions. RAND Journal of Economics, 24:668-680.
  • 6Chen, F. (2007). Auctioning supply contracts. Management Science, 53:1562-1576.
  • 7Chu, L.Y. & Sappington, D. (2007). A note on optimal procurement contracts with limited direct cost inflation. Journal of Economic Theory, 137:745-753.
  • 8Cramton, P. (1992). Strategic delay in bargaining with two-sided uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies, 59:205-225.
  • 9Harstad, R.M. & Rothkopf, M.H. (1995). Withdrawable bids as winner's curse insurance. Operations Research, 43 (6): 983-994.
  • 10Kessler, A.S. & Lulfesmann, C. (2004). Bilateral bargaining, unverifiable quality and options to return. Economic Theory, 23: 395-410.

共引文献42

同被引文献27

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部