期刊文献+

基于径向基函数网络的京津冀地区生态系统服务脆弱性评估 被引量:9

Assessing the Vulnerability of Ecosystem Services of BeijingTianjin-Hebei Area Based on Radial Basis Function Network
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在定义生态系统服务脆弱性的基础上,以京津冀地区为例,计算2001—2009年区域内生态系统服务价值的变化。利用径向基函数网络,选取9个县市作为训练数据,对区域内164个县市(区)土地利用/覆被变化导致的潜在影响和人类的适应能力进行定量评价。评价结果表明,京津冀地区2001—2009年生态系统服务供给呈下降趋势,单位面积价值量降低184.36元/公顷;未来土地利用/覆被变化对生态系统服务的潜在影响呈现东南—西北—中部正向影响递减,而负向影响递增的格局。适应能力的评价结果表明,北京、天津、唐山等较大城市及周边地区适应能力评价结果较优。将潜在影响与适应能力通过不同的组合类型得到的脆弱性分级表明,京津冀地区生态系统服务的脆弱性格局为:东部环渤海地区脆弱性程度较低,东南平原地区与西北部森林山区次之,西部太行山地区脆弱性程度较高。统计结果显示,区域内92.4%的人口处于脆弱性分级2~4这一范围内。 The authors put forward the concept of vulnerability of ecosystem services, and carries a case study in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Area. The changes of ecosystem services were calculated from 2001 to 2009 in this region, and radial basis function network was used to assess the potential impacts of ecosystem services to land use change and the adaptive capacity of human-beings based on the 9 training data chosen from 164 counties. The results show that the average ecosystem services value of study area has declined 184.36 yuan/ha from 2001 to 2009, and the positive potential impacts of ecosystem services to future land use change declines from southeast to northwest, and the middle shows the least; the districts near big cities such as Beijing, Tianjin and Tangshan have the best adaptive capacity, which has a positive correlation with GDP; and by integrating potential impacts and adaptive capacity, the study gives the spatial pattern of the vulnerability of ecosystem services: the districts near Bohai Sea turn out to be the least vulnerable; the plain in the southeast and mountains in the northwest are worse; and the districts near Taihang Mountains in the west are the most vulnerable. Of all the residents living in this region, 92.4% range between 2 to 4 in the classification of vulnerability.
出处 《北京大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期1040-1046,共7页 Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis
基金 国家自然科学基金(41130534和40971052)资助
关键词 生态系统服务脆弱性 潜在影响 适应能力 径向基函数网络 京津冀地区 vulnerability of ecosystem services potential impact adaptive capacity radial basis function network Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Daily G C. Nature’s services: societal dependence onnatural ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press,1997.
  • 2Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value ofthe world’s ecosystem services and natural capital.Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260.
  • 3Winfree R, Gross B J, Kremen C. Valuing pollinationservices to agriculture. Ecological Economics, 2011,71: 80-88.
  • 4Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R, et al. Globalmapping of ecosystem services and conservationpriorities. PNAS, 2008, 105(28): 9495-9500.
  • 5Balvanera P, Pfisterer A B, Buchmann N, et al. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecology Letters, 2006, 9:1146-1156.
  • 6Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J. Under-standing relationships among multiple ecosystemservices. Ecology Letters, 2009,12(12): 1394-1404.
  • 7Wallace K J. Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biological Conservation, 2007, 139:235-246.
  • 8Fisher B, Turner R K,Morling P. Defining andclassifying ecosystem services for decision making.Ecological Economics, 2009,68: 643-653.
  • 9Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems andhuman well-being: a framework for assessment.Washington, DC: Island Press, 2003.
  • 10谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,郑度,李双成.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196. 被引量:2661

二级参考文献196

共引文献4315

同被引文献148

引证文献9

二级引证文献129

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部