期刊文献+

我国淋巴瘤随机对照临床试验的现况分析 被引量:3

Present Status of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials for Lymphoma in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]分析我国淋巴瘤治疗领域随机对照临床试验研究现状。[方法]选择"万方数据库"(1989~2012)、"中国知网"(1979~2013),以"淋巴瘤"、"随机"、"对照"、"病人"或"病例"或"患者"为检索词,对2000年1月至2011年12月间期刊发表的随机对照临床试验文献进行检索。分析文献的发表时间、研究者所在地区及机构、文献的疾病分布、文献来源期刊等。[结果]有效文献120篇,2000~2005年37篇(30.8%),2006~2011年83篇(69.2%);文献产出地主要分布于东南沿海地区;研究内容集中于非霍奇金淋巴瘤的治疗,特别是利妥昔单抗及CHOP方案的应用。[结论]我国淋巴瘤治疗性随机对照临床试验研究方向与数量随时间呈增多趋势,然而仍存在地区分布不均、研究质量不高等问题。 [Purpose] To evaluate the current situation of randomized controlled clinical trials for lymphoma in China.[Methods] The randomized controlled clinical trials published in the journals from January 2000 to December 2011 were searched by using "lymphoma","random","control"and "patient" or "case" as the search words from "WANFANG data"(1989~2012) and "CNKI.NET"(1979 ~2013) database. The publication years,researchers' regions and institutions,diseases distribution and source journals of these literatures were analyzed. [Results] A total of 120valid literatures were enrolled,including 37(30.8%) articles from 2000 to 2005,83(69.2%) articles from 2006 to 2011. Literatures output mainly were distributed in the southeast coastal areas. Research content focused on the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma,especially the applications of rituximab and CHOP regimen.[Conclusions] Lymphoma therapeutic randomized controlled trials in China have the same research direction with international,the literature numbers showed an increasing trend over time.However,there are still some problems such as uneven areas distribution,low research quality,etc.
出处 《中国肿瘤》 CAS 2013年第11期939-942,共4页 China Cancer
基金 山西省软科学研究项目(2011-041073-01)
关键词 淋巴瘤 随机对照试验 文献计量学 lymphoma randomized controlled trials bibliometrics
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献61

  • 1刘树春,何素清.美国《医学索引》1997年收录中国期刊分析[J].医学信息学杂志,1998,25(3):53-55. 被引量:6
  • 2林桐榆,张红雨,黄岩,管忠震,沈悌,石远凯,朱军,克晓燕,王华庆,沈志祥,于世英,刘霆,施笑利.R-CHOP与CHOP方案治疗初治弥漫大B细胞型淋巴瘤在中国的多中心随机对照研究[J].癌症,2005,24(12):1421-1426. 被引量:48
  • 3毛兵,王刚,陈小东,樊涛,刘佳,王蕾,常静,张颖,郭佳,李廷谦.《中国中西医结合杂志》发表随机对照试验报告的质量评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2006,6(4):297-304. 被引量:37
  • 4王彦华,蔡华,翁香勤,孙婉玲,李大启.CHOP方案单用或联合美罗华治疗48例弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的随机对照临床研究[J].中国综合临床,2006,22(11):1030-1032. 被引量:17
  • 5Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials, 1996, 17: 1-12.
  • 6Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Quality of randomized clinical trials affects estimates of intervention efficacy//Ⅶ Cochrane Colloquium, Rome, 1999: 57.
  • 7Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, et al. Does quality of reports of randomized trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyse? Lancet, 1998, 352: 609-613.
  • 8Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes R, et al. Empirical evidence of bias. JAMA, 1995, 273: 408-412.
  • 9Lenz G, Dreyling M, Hoster E, et al. Immunochemotherapy with rituximab and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin,vincristine, and prednisone significantly improves response and time to treatment failure, but not long-term outcome in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial of the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG). J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23: 1984-1992.
  • 10Hiddemann W, Kneba M, Dreyling M, et al. Frontline therapy with rituximab added to the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) significantly improves the outcome for patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma compared with therapy with CHOP alone: results of a prospective randomized study of the German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group. Blood, 2005, 106: 3725-3732.

共引文献73

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部